Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28280581›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Cultural factors that affected the spatial and temporal epidemiology of kuru.

J T Whitfield, W H Pako, J Collinge, M P Alpers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How cultural innovations trigger the emergence of new pathogens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J T WhitfieldMRC Prion Unit and Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases , UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery , Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG , UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4878-0897
W H PakoPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research , PO Box 60, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province , Papua New Guinea.
J CollingeMRC Prion Unit and Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases , UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery , Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG , UK.
M P AlpersMRC Prion Unit and Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; International Health Research, Curtin University, Room 108, Shenton Park Campus, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia; Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 60, Goroka, Eastern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea.
MRC Prion Unit · GBCurtin University · AUPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research · PG

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U123160657Medical Research Council MC_UU_00024/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kuru is a prion disease which became epidemic among the Fore and surrounding linguistic groups in Papua New Guinea, peaking in the late 1950s. It was transmitted during the transumption (endocannibalism) of dead family members at mortuary feasts. In this study, we aimed to explain the historical spread and the changing epidemiological patterns of kuru by analysing factors that affected its transmission. We also examined what cultural group principally determined a family's behaviour during mortuary rituals. Our investigations showed that differences in mortuary practices were responsible for the initial pattern of the spread of kuru and the ultimate shape of the epidemic, and for subsequent spatio-temporal differences in the epidemiology of kuru. Before transumption stopped altogether, the South Fore continued to eat the bodies of those who had died of kuru, whereas other linguistic groups, sooner or later, stopped doing so. The linguistic group was the primary cultural group that determined behaviour but at linguistic boundaries the neighbouring group's cultural practices were often adopted. The epidemiological changes were not explained by genetic differences, but genetic studies led to an understanding of genetic susceptibility to kuru and the selection pressure imposed by kuru, and provided new insights into human history and evolution.

Indexed as

cannibalismepidemiologykurumortuary ritespriontransumption

Identifiers

PMID28280581
PMCPMC5319347
OpenAlexW2574522376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.