Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28280546›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Chimpanzees breed with genetically dissimilar mates.

Kara K Walker, Rebecca S Rudicell, Yingying Li, Beatrice H Hahn, Emily Wroblewski, Anne E Pusey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Explaining variation in the kinship composition of mammal groups.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kara K WalkerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology , Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7462-8453
Rebecca S RudicellSanofi , Cambridge, MA , USA.
Yingying LiDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA.
Beatrice H HahnDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA.
Emily WroblewskiDepartment of Structural Biology , Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA , USA.
Anne E PuseyDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology , Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USSanofi (United States) · USStanford University · US

Funding

Studies of the precursor of the human AIDS virus in its natural chimpanzee hostR01AI120810 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAHN, BEATRICE H · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding adversely affects fitness, whereas heterozygosity often augments it. Therefore, mechanisms to avoid inbreeding and increase genetic distance between mates should be advantageous in species where adult relatives reside together. Here we investigate mate choice for genetic dissimilarity in chimpanzees, a species in which many females avoid inbreeding through dispersal, but where promiscuous mating and sexual coercion can limit choice when related adults reside together. We take advantage of incomplete female dispersal in Gombe National Park, Tanzania to compare mate choice for genetic dissimilarity among immigrant and natal females in two communities using pairwise relatedness measures in 135 genotyped chimpanzees. As expected, natal females were more related to adult males in their community than were immigrant females. However, among 62 breeding events, natal females were not more related to the sires of their offspring than immigrant females, despite four instances of close inbreeding. Moreover, females were generally less related to the sires of their offspring than to non-sires. These results demonstrate that chimpanzees may be capable of detecting relatedness and selecting mates on the basis of genetic distance.

Indexed as

inbreeding avoidancekin recognitionmate choicerelatedness

Identifiers

PMID28280546
PMCPMC5319312
OpenAlexW2576547867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.