Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28279460›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2017

Forecasting the new case detection rate of leprosy in four states of Brazil: A comparison of modelling approaches.

David J Blok, Ronald E Crump, Ram Sundaresh, Martial Ndeffo-Mbah, Alison P Galvani, Travis C Porco, Sake J de Vlas, Graham F Medley, Jan Hendrik Richardus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Counting Down the 2020 Goals for 9 Neglected Tropical Diseases: What Have We Learned From Quantitative Analysis and Transmission Modeling?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Policy Lessons From Quantitative Modeling of Leprosy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Products of Compartmental Models in Epidemiology.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David J BlokDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.j.blok.1@erasmusmc.nl.
Ronald E CrumpWarwick Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Ram SundareshYale University, Department of Public Health, USA.
Martial Ndeffo-MbahYale University, Department of Public Health, USA.
Alison P GalvaniYale University, Department of Public Health, USA.
Travis C PorcoFI Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0412 USA.
Sake J de VlasDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Graham F MedleyDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Jan Hendrik RichardusDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

"Modeling contact investigation and rapid response"U01GM087728 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PORCO, TRAVIS CHRISTIAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM087728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrazil has the second highest annual number of new leprosy cases. The aim of this study is to formally compare predictions of future new case detection rate (NCDR) trends and the annual probability of NCDR falling below 10/100,000 of four different modelling approaches in four states of Brazil: Rio Grande do Norte, Amazonas, Ceará, Tocantins.

methodsA linear mixed model, a back-calculation approach, a deterministic compartmental model and an individual-based model were used. All models were fitted to leprosy data obtained from the Brazilian national database (SINAN). First, models were fitted to the data up to 2011, and predictions were made for NCDR for 2012-2014. Second, data up to 2014 were considered and forecasts of NCDR were generated for each year from 2015 to 2040. The resulting distributions of NCDR and the probability of NCDR being below 10/100,000 of the population for each year were then compared between approaches.

resultsEach model performed well in model fitting and the short-term forecasting of future NCDR. Long-term forecasting of NCDR and the probability of NCDR falling below 10/100,000 differed between models. All agree that the trend of NCDR will continue to decrease in all states until 2040. Reaching a NCDR of less than 10/100,000 by 2020 was only likely in Rio Grande do Norte. Prediction until 2040 showed that the target was also achieved in Amazonas, while in Ceará and Tocantins the NCDR most likely remain (far) above 10/100,000.

conclusionsAll models agree that, while incidence is likely to decline, achieving a NCDR below 10/100,000 by 2020 is unlikely in some states. Long-term prediction showed a downward trend with more variation between models, but highlights the need for further control measures to reduce the incidence of new infections if leprosy is to be eliminated.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBrazilForecastingHumansIncidenceLeprosyBack-calculationBrazilCompartmentalForecastIndividual-based modelLeprosyLMERModel comparison

Identifiers

PMID28279460
PMCPMC6198811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.