ArticleEpidemics2017
Probabilistic forecasts of trachoma transmission at the district level: A statistical model comparison.
Article in Epidemics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- District-Level Forecast of Achieving Trachoma Elimination as a Public Health Problem By 2030: An Ensemble Modelling Approach.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Forecasting the elimination of active trachoma: An empirical model.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Predicting future community-level ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection prevalence using serological, clinical, molecular, and geospatial data.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Forecasting Trachoma Control and Identifying Transmission-Hotspots.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Trachoma Prevalence After Discontinuation of Mass Azithromycin Distribution.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Estimation of the reproduction number and early prediction of the COVID-19 outbreak in India using a statistical computing approach.Epidemiology and health · 2020Article
- Insights from mathematical modelling and quantitative analysis on the proposed 2030 goals for trachoma.Gates open research · 2019Article
- Models of Trachoma Transmission and Their Policy Implications: From Control to Elimination.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Review
- Counting Down the 2020 Goals for 9 Neglected Tropical Diseases: What Have We Learned From Quantitative Analysis and Transmission Modeling?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The World Health Organization and its partners are aiming to eliminate trachoma as a public health problem by 2020. In this study, we compare forecasts of TF prevalence in 2011 for 7 different statistical and mechanistic models across 9 de-identified trachoma endemic districts, representing 4 unique trachoma endemic countries. We forecast TF prevalence between 1-6 years ahead in time and compare the 7 different models to the observed 2011 data using a log-likelihood score. An SIS model, including a district-specific random effect for the district-specific transmission coefficient, had the highest log-likelihood score across all 9 districts and was therefore the best performing model. While overall the deterministic transmission model was the least well performing model, although it did comparably well to the other models for 8 of 9 districts. We perform a statistically rigorous comparison of the forecasting ability of a range of mathematical and statistical models across multiple endemic districts between 1 and 6 years ahead of the last collected TF prevalence data point in 2011, assessing results against surveillance data. This study is a step towards making statements about likelihood and time to elimination with regard to the WHO GET2020 goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.