Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28279455›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2017

Modelling the elimination of river blindness using long-term epidemiological and programmatic data from Mali and Senegal.

Martin Walker, Wilma A Stolk, Matthew A Dixon, Christian Bottomley, Lamine Diawara, Mamadou O Traoré, Sake J de Vlas, María-Gloria Basáñez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Comparison of Repeated Doses of Ivermectin Versus Ivermectin Plus Albendazole for the Treatment of Onchocerciasis: A Randomized, Open-label, Clinical Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Trial
  5. Macrofilaricidal Efficacy of Repeated Doses of Ivermectin for the Treatment of River Blindness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can mass drug administration of moxidectin accelerate onchocerciasis elimination in Africa?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Serological Evaluation of Onchocerciasis and Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination in the Bakoye and Falémé Foci, Mali.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. An Overview of the Management of Mansonellosis.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin WalkerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1 PG, London, UK; Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences and London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, UK. Electronic address: m.walker06@imperial.ac.uk.
Wilma A StolkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthew A DixonDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1 PG, London, UK.
Christian BottomleyDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Lamine DiawaraInter-Country Support Team for West Africa, World Health Organization 158, Place de l'Indépendance 03 BP 7019, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.
Mamadou O TraoréProgramme National de Lutte contre l'Onchocercose (PNLO), Direction Nationale de la Santé (DNS), B.P. 233, Bamako, Mali.
Sake J de VlasDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
María-Gloria BasáñezDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1 PG, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 092677/Z/10/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The onchocerciasis transmission models EPIONCHO and ONCHOSIM have been independently developed and used to explore the feasibility of eliminating onchocerciasis from Africa with mass (annual or biannual) distribution of ivermectin within the timeframes proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and endorsed by the 2012 London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases (i.e. by 2020/2025). Based on the findings of our previous model comparison, we implemented technical refinements and tested the projections of EPIONCHO and ONCHOSIM against long-term epidemiological data from two West African transmission foci in Mali and Senegal where the observed prevalence of infection was brought to zero circa 2007-2009 after 15-17 years of mass ivermectin treatment. We simulated these interventions using programmatic information on the frequency and coverage of mass treatments and trained the model projections using longitudinal parasitological data from 27 communities, evaluating the projected outcome of elimination (local parasite extinction) or resurgence. We found that EPIONCHO and ONCHOSIM captured adequately the epidemiological trends during mass treatment but that resurgence, while never predicted by ONCHOSIM, was predicted by EPIONCHO in some communities with the highest (inferred) vector biting rates and associated pre-intervention endemicities. Resurgence can be extremely protracted such that low (microfilarial) prevalence between 1% and 5% can be maintained for 3-5 years before manifesting more prominently. We highlight that post-treatment and post-elimination surveillance protocols must be implemented for long enough and with high enough sensitivity to detect possible residual latent infections potentially indicative of resurgence. We also discuss uncertainty and differences between EPIONCHO and ONCHOSIM projections, the potential importance of vector control in high-transmission settings as a complementary intervention strategy, and the short remaining timeline for African countries to be ready to stop treatment safely and begin surveillance in order to meet the impending 2020/2025 elimination targets.

Indexed as

HumansIvermectinMaliOnchocerciasis, OcularPrevalenceSenegalIvermectinEliminationMathematical modellingOnchocerciasisRiver blindnessSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID28279455
PMCPMC5340858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.