Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28279064›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2018

Cancer-Specific Mortality Among Korean Men with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiotherapy: A Multi-Center Study Using Propensity Scoring and Competing Risk Regression Analyses.

Kyo Chul Koo, Jin Seon Cho, Woo Jin Bang, Seung Hwan Lee, Sung Yong Cho, Sun Il Kim, Se Joong Kim, Koon Ho Rha, Sung Joon Hong, Byung Ha Chung

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oncology letters · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kyo Chul KooDepartment of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Seon ChoDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Woo Jin BangDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Seung Hwan LeeDepartment of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Yong ChoDepartment of Urology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Sun Il KimDepartment of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Se Joong KimDepartment of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Koon Ho RhaDepartment of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Joon HongDepartment of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Ha ChungDepartment of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ajou University · KRGangnam Severance Hospital · KRHallym University · KRSeverance Hospital · KRInje University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudies comparing radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes with those of radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (RT±ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we used propensity score-matched analysis and competing risk regression analysis to compare cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) between these two treatments. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe multi-center, Severance Urological Oncology Group registry was utilized to identify 3,028 patients with clinically localized or locally advanced PCa treated by RP (n=2,521) or RT±ADT (n=507) between 2000 and 2016. RT±ADT cases (n=339) were matched with an equal number of RP cases by propensity scoring based on age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, clinical tumor stage, biopsy Gleason score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). CSM and OCM were co-primary endpoints.

resultsMedian follow-up was 65.0 months. Five-year overall survival rates for patients treated with RP and RT±ADT were 94.7% and 92.0%, respectively (p=0.105). Cumulative incidence estimates revealed comparable CSM rates following both treatments within all National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groups. Gleason score ≥ 8 was associated with higher risk of CSM (p=0.009). OCM rates were comparable between both groups in the low- and intermediate-risk categories (p=0.354 and p=0.643, respectively). For high-risk patients, RT±ADT resulted in higher OCM rates than RP (p=0.011). Predictors of OCM were age ≥ 75 years (p=0.002) and CCI ≥ 2 (p < 0.001).

conclusionRP and RT±ADT provide comparable CSM outcomes in patients with localized or locally advanced PCa. The risk of OCM may be higher for older high-risk patients with significant comorbidities.

Indexed as

AgedHumansMalePropensity ScoreProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsProstatectomyProstatic neoplasmsRadiotherapyTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID28279064
PMCPMC5784628
OpenAlexW2592274942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.