Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28278514›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system.

Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Ho Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Dae-Won Lee, Yongjun Cha, Xianyu Wen, Tae Hun Lee, Nam-Yun Cho, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transcription factor expression repertoire basis for epigenetic and transcriptional subtypes of colorectal cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong Mo BaeLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung Ho KimLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yoonjin KwakDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
Dae-Won LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Yongjun ChaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Xianyu WenLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Tae Hun LeeLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Nam-Yun ChoLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Yong JeongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyu Joo ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sae Won HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hye Seung LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
Tae-You KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Gyeong Hoon KangLaboratory of Epigenetics, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of molecular carcinogenic pathways. Based on recent findings regarding the multiple serrated neoplasia pathway, we revised an eight-marker panel for a new CIMP classification system.

methods1370 patients who received surgical resection for CRCs were classified into three CIMP subtypes (CIMP-N: 0-4 methylated markers, CIMP-P1: 5-6 methylated markers and CIMP-P2: 7-8 methylated markers). Our findings were validated in a separate set of high-risk stage II or stage III CRCs receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (n=950).

resultsA total of 1287/62/21 CRCs cases were classified as CIMP-N/CIMP-P1/CIMP-P2, respectively. CIMP-N showed male predominance, distal location, lower T, N category and devoid of BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P1 showed female predominance, proximal location, advanced TNM stage, mild decrease of CK20 and CDX2 expression, mild increase of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P2 showed older age, female predominance, proximal location, advanced T category, markedly reduced CK20 and CDX2 expression, rare KRAS mutation, high frequency of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-N showed better 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.28-0.78) in discovery set and better 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS; HR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.29-0.88) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1. CIMP-P2 showed marginally better 5-year CSS (HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.07-1.22) in discovery set and marginally better 5-year RFS (HR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.92) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1.

conclusionsCIMP subtypes classified using our revised system showed different clinical outcomes, demonstrating the heterogeneity of multiple serrated precursors of CIMP-positive CRCs.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCpG IslandsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28278514
PMCPMC5396110
OpenAlexW3149222187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.