ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017
Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Role of the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer.Disease markers · 2022Pooled it
- Epigenetic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Genomic innovations in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Insight into the role of DNA methylation in prognosis and treatment response prediction of gastrointestinal cancers.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Mutation Analysis of TMB-High Colorectal Cancer: Insights Into Molecular Pathways and Clinical Implications.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological and molecular features of genome-stable colorectal cancers.Histology and histopathology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in the Treatment of GI Cancers.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Review
- Immunogenomic characteristics and prognostic implications of terminally exhausted CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- The combination of CDX2 expression status and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density as a prognostic factor in adjuvant FOLFOX-treated patients with stage III colorectal cancers.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Cellular and molecular events in colorectal cancer: biological mechanisms, cell death pathways, drug resistance and signalling network interactions.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Transcription factor expression repertoire basis for epigenetic and transcriptional subtypes of colorectal cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Application of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology in basic research, diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Adenosine Kinase on Deoxyribonucleic Acid Methylation: Adenosine Receptor-Independent Pathway inFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Tumor microenvironment-adjusted prognostic implications of the KRAS mutation subtype in patients with stage III colorectal cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Identifying Novel Actionable Targets in Colon Cancer.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Molecular Features of the Serrated Pathway to Colorectal Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.Gut and liver · 2021Review
- Advances in CpG Island Methylator Phenotype Colorectal Cancer Therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Improving the Prognosis of Colon Cancer through Knowledge-Based Clinical-Molecular Integrated Analysis.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Universal Screening of Gastrointestinal Malignancies for Mismatch Repair Deficiency at Stanford.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of molecular carcinogenic pathways. Based on recent findings regarding the multiple serrated neoplasia pathway, we revised an eight-marker panel for a new CIMP classification system.
methods1370 patients who received surgical resection for CRCs were classified into three CIMP subtypes (CIMP-N: 0-4 methylated markers, CIMP-P1: 5-6 methylated markers and CIMP-P2: 7-8 methylated markers). Our findings were validated in a separate set of high-risk stage II or stage III CRCs receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (n=950).
resultsA total of 1287/62/21 CRCs cases were classified as CIMP-N/CIMP-P1/CIMP-P2, respectively. CIMP-N showed male predominance, distal location, lower T, N category and devoid of BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P1 showed female predominance, proximal location, advanced TNM stage, mild decrease of CK20 and CDX2 expression, mild increase of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P2 showed older age, female predominance, proximal location, advanced T category, markedly reduced CK20 and CDX2 expression, rare KRAS mutation, high frequency of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-N showed better 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.28-0.78) in discovery set and better 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS; HR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.29-0.88) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1. CIMP-P2 showed marginally better 5-year CSS (HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.07-1.22) in discovery set and marginally better 5-year RFS (HR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.92) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1.
conclusionsCIMP subtypes classified using our revised system showed different clinical outcomes, demonstrating the heterogeneity of multiple serrated precursors of CIMP-positive CRCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.