Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28278423›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2017

Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients.

Arthur E Frankel, Ugur Eskiocak, Jennifer G Gill, Stacy Yuan, Vijayashree Ramesh, Thomas W Froehlich, Chul Ahn, Sean J Morrison

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Repurposing of NKA inhibitors ('cardiac glycosides'): a critical analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Digoxin and its NaBioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The botanical drug PBI-05204, a supercritical COFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur E FrankelDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: Arthur.frankel@utsouthwestern.edu.
Ugur EskiocakChildren's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Compass Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.
Jennifer G GillChildren's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Stacy YuanChildren's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Vijayashree RameshChildren's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Thomas W FroehlichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Chul AhnDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Sean J MorrisonChildren's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSage Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

Dermatology Research Training ProgramT32AR065969 · NIAMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PONCIANO D CRUZ, Tamia Alisha Harris-Tryon · 2014 to 2026
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR065969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first prospective study of a combination therapy involving a cardenolide and a MEK inhibitor for metastatic melanoma. Whereas BRAF mutant melanomas can exhibit profound responses to treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, there are fewer options for BRAF wild-type melanomas. In preclinical studies, we discovered that cardenolides synergize with MEK inhibitor to promote the regression of patient-derived xenografts irrespective of BRAF mutation status. We therefore conducted a phase 1B study of digoxin 0.25 mg and trametinib 2 mg given orally once daily in 20 patients with advanced, refractory, BRAF wild-type melanomas. The most common adverse events were rash, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. The response rate was 4/20 or 20% with response durations of 2, 4, 6, and 8 months. The disease control rate (including partial responses and stable disease) was 13/20 or 65% of patients, including 5/6 or 83% of patients with NRAS mutant melanomas and 8/14 or 57% of NRAS wild-type melanomas. Patients with stable disease had disease control for 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 10 months. Xenografts from four patients recapitulated the treatment responses observed in patients. Based on these pilot results, an expansion arm of digoxin plus MEK inhibitor is warranted for NRAS mutant metastatic melanoma patients who are refractory or intolerant of immunotherapy. KEY POINTS: Digoxin plus trametinib is well tolerated and achieves a high rate of disease control in BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDigoxinDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiceMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafDigoxinProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinib

Identifiers

PMID28278423
PMCPMC5342980
OpenAlexW2592895660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.