Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28278169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Molecular cytogenetic (FISH) and genome analysis of diploid wheatgrasses and their phylogenetic relationship.

Gabriella Linc, Eszter Gaál, István Molnár, Diana Icsó, Ekaterina Badaeva, Márta Molnár-Láng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Analysis of Satellite DNA inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Establishment of a set of St-group wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A chromosome arm fromMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Intraspecific divergence of diploid grassComparative cytogenetics · 2023
    Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Uncovering homeologous relationships between tetraploid Agropyron cristatum and bread wheat genomes using COS markers.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Broadening the bread wheat D genome.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriella LincDepartment of Plant Genetic Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3149-9786
Eszter GaálDepartment of Plant Genetic Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary.
István MolnárDepartment of Plant Genetic Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Diana IcsóDepartment of Plant Genetic Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Ekaterina BadaevaVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Márta Molnár-LángDepartment of Plant Genetic Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports detailed FISH-based karyotypes for three diploid wheatgrass species Agropyron cristatum (L.) Beauv., Thinopyrum bessarabicum (Savul.&Rayss) A. Löve, Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Löve, the supposed ancestors of hexaploid Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R.Dewey, compiled using DNA repeats and comparative genome analysis based on COS markers. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with repetitive DNA probes proved suitable for the identification of individual chromosomes in the diploid JJ, StSt and PP genomes. Of the seven microsatellite markers tested only the (GAA)n trinucleotide sequence was appropriate for use as a single chromosome marker for the P. spicata AS chromosome. Based on COS marker analysis, the phylogenetic relationship between diploid wheatgrasses and the hexaploid bread wheat genomes was established. These findings confirmed that the J and E genomes are in neighbouring clusters.

Indexed as

DiploidyGenome, PlantPhylogenyChromosomes, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMicrosatellite RepeatsPoaceae

Identifiers

PMID28278169
PMCPMC5344461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.