ReviewGM crops & food2017
New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
Review in GM crops & food, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetically modified foods and human health: a comprehensive review and cross-national time-trend analysis.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward genetically modified foods in Lebanon.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Review
- Cross-Cultural Analysis of Consumers' Avoidance of Snack Food Ingredients Across 13 Countries Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Method.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A perspective on the regulation of cultivated meat in the European Union.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: strategies, products, and politics.GM crops & food · 2024Article
- A comparative guide to expression systems for phage lysin production.Essays in biochemistry · 2024Review
- A CRISPR/Cas9-based vector system enables the fast breeding of selection-marker-free canola with Rcr1-rendered clubroot resistance.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Microbial Phytase in a Diet with Lupine and Extruded Full-Fat Soya Seeds Affects the Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Bone Mineralization of Fatteners.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Unlocking the Secret to Higher Crop Yield: The Potential for Histone Modifications.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- PossibleFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Unintended Genomic Outcomes in Current and Next Generation GM Techniques: A Systematic Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Carcass and Meat Quality Traits of Medium-Growing Broiler Chickens Fed Soybean or Pea Bean and Raised under Semi-Intensive Conditions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- A CRISPR/Cas9-Based System with Controllable Auto-Excision Feature Serving Cisgenic Plant Breeding and Beyond.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Applications of Genomic Tools in Plant Breeding: Crop Biofortification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Efficiency of Soybean Products in Broiler Chicken Nutrition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Carotenoids and Apocarotenoids in Planta: Their Role in Plant Development, Contribution to the Flavour and Aroma of Fruits and Flowers, and Their Nutraceutical Benefits.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Should we still worry about the safety of GMO foods? Why and why not? A review.Food science & nutrition · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, current EU GMO regulations are subjected to a point-by point analysis to determine their suitability for agriculture in modern Europe. Our analysis concerns present GMO regulations as well as suggestions for possible new regulations for genome editing and New Breeding Techniques (for which no regulations presently exist). Firstly, the present GMO regulations stem from the early days of recombinant DNA and are not adapted to current scientific understanding on this subject. Scientific understanding of GMOs has changed and these regulations are now, not only unfit for their original purpose, but, the purpose itself is now no longer scientifically valid. Indeed, they defy scientific, economic, and even common, sense. A major EU regulatory preconception is that GM crops are basically different from their parent crops. Thus, the EU regulations are "process based" regulations that discriminate against GMOs simply because they are GMOs. However current scientific evidence shows a blending of classical crops and their GMO counterparts with no clear demarcation line between them. Canada has a "product based" approach and determines the safety of each new crop variety independently of the process used to obtain it. We advise that the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.