Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28277324›Full record

Observational studyAnesthesia and analgesia2017

Risk Factors for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage After Cesarean Delivery: Case-Control Studies.

Alexander J Butwick, Bharathi Ramachandran, Priya Hegde, Edward T Riley, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Lorene M Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk Factors for Postpartum Hemorrhage in Severe Pre-Eclampsia: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study of 1953 Cases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Is Grand Multiparity an Independent Risk Factor for Blood Transfusion?Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander J ButwickFrom the Departments of *Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine; †Obstetrics and Gynecology; and ‡Health Research and Policy (Division of Epidemiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Bharathi Ramachandran
Priya Hegde
Edward T Riley
Yasser Y El-Sayed
Lorene M Nelson
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital · CN

Funding

Postpartum Hemmorrhage and Anemia: Epidemiologic and Cost-Effectiveness AnalysesK23HD070972 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTWICK, ALEXANDER JAMES · 2013 to 2017
$699k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD070972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who undergo intrapartum caesarean delivery (CD) are at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) compared with those undergoing prelabor CD. To determine whether the presence and strength of the associations between individual risk factors and severe PPH vary among women undergoing prelabor CD or intrapartum CD, stratified analyses are needed according to CD subtype.

methodsTo identify risk factors for severe PPH within 2 distinct CD populations, prelabor CD and intrapartum CD, we performed 2 case-control studies. Women in each study cohort delivered at a tertiary obstetric center in the United States between 2002 and 2012. For each study, cases were women who had a blood loss ≥1500 mL or who received an intraoperative or postoperative transfusion up to 48 hours after delivery. Risk factors for severe PPH among women undergoing prelabor CD or intrapartum CD were examined in separate logistic regression models.

resultsFor prelabor CD, we identified 269 cases and 550 controls. Clinical factors with the highest adjusted odds for severe PPH during prelabor CD were general anesthesia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 22.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-99.9; reference group = spinal anesthesia), multiple pregnancies (aOR = 8.0; 95% CI, 4.2-15.0; reference group = singleton pregnancy), and placenta previa (aOR = 6.3; 95% CI, 3.4-11.8). For intrapartum CD, we identified 278 cases and 572 controls. Clinical factors with the highest adjusted odds for severe PPH during intrapartum CD were general anesthesia (aOR = 5.4; 95% CI, 1.7-17.1), multiple pregnancies (aOR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.7-6.3), and a predelivery hemoglobin ≤ 9.9 g/dL (aOR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.9; reference group = predelivery hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL).

conclusionsWomen who undergo prelabor CD and intrapartum CD have several shared risk factors for severe PPH (general anesthesia and multiple pregnancies). However, the risk factor profiles for severe PPH differed between these CD cohorts. Recognizing these differences may be important when planning resources and interventions for high-risk patients undergoing either prelabor or intrapartum CD.

Indexed as

ObstetricsAdultAnesthesia, GeneralCase-Control StudiesCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodLabor, ObstetricParturitionPostoperative PeriodPostpartum HemorrhagePostpartum PeriodPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28277324
PMCPMC5522356
OpenAlexW2594310849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.