ReviewHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2017
Facilitative Components of Collaborative Learning: A Review of Nine Health Research Networks.
Review in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collaboration as a Catalyst for Advancing Rare Disease Research: The Experience of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- The development of national learning collaborative for ePRO enabled RSM in oncology: insights for co-implementation.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Designing for implementation: development, delivery, and multi-method evaluation of a clinician training program for a novel technology-based concussion assessment tool.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Exploring factors affecting knowledge creation in under-researched healthcare topics: a case study of women's health research.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation.Research Evaluation · 2023Article
- Stakeholder-engaged co-design and implementation of web-based tools to enhance the dissemination and implementation of AHRQ EPC reports.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- Article
- Global mental health and the DIADA project.Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria · 2021Article
- Multi-level analysis of the learning health system: Integrating contributions from research on organizations and implementation.Learning health systems · 2021Article
- A Collaborative Learning Assessment of Developmental Care Practices for Infants in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.The Journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- A Perspective of International Collaboration Through Web-Based Telecommunication-Inspired by COVID-19 Crisis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- A Qualitative Exploration of COVID+ Learning Network Webinars: Healthcare Learnings at Pace in a State of Rapid Change.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Development and Early Experience of a Primary Care Learning Collaborative in a Large Health Care System.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCollaborative research networks are increasingly used as an effective mechanism for accelerating knowledge transfer into policy and practice. This paper explored the characteristics and collaborative learning approaches of nine health research networks. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
settingSemi-structured interviews with representatives from eight diverse US health services research networks conducted between November 2012 and January 2013 and program evaluation data from a ninth. STUDY
designThe qualitative analysis assessed each network's purpose, duration, funding sources, governance structure, methods used to foster collaboration, and barriers and facilitators to collaborative learning. DATA COLLECTION: The authors reviewed detailed notes from the interviews to distill salient themes. PRINCIPAL
findingsFace-to-face meetings, intentional facilitation and communication, shared vision, trust among members and willingness to work together were key facilitators of collaborative learning. Competing priorities for members, limited funding and lack of long-term support and geographic dispersion were the main barriers to coordination and collaboration across research network members.
conclusionThe findings illustrate the importance of collaborative learning in research networks and the challenges to evaluating the success of research network functionality. Conducting readiness assessments and developing process and outcome evaluation metrics will advance the design and show the impact of collaborative research networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28277202PMC5344361W2594222290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.