Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28277053›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2017

Balancing trust and power: a qualitative study of GPs perceptions and strategies for retaining patients in preventive health checks.

Marie Broholm-Jørgensen, Ann Dorrit Guassora, Susanne Reventlow, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Primary Care Networks and Starfield's 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie Broholm-Jørgensena National Institute of Public Health , Research Programme on Health and Social Conditions, University of Southern Denmark , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Ann Dorrit Guassorab The Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Susanne Reventlowb The Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Susanne Oksbjerg Daltonc Survivorship , Danish Cancer Society Research Center , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsena National Institute of Public Health , Research Programme on Health and Social Conditions, University of Southern Denmark , Copenhagen , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known about how strategies of retaining patients are acted out by general practitioners (GPs) in the clinical encounter. With this study, we apply Grimens' (2009) analytical connection between trust and power to explore how trust and power appear in preventive health checks from the GPs' perspectives, and in what way trust and power affect and/or challenge strategies towards retaining patients without formal education.

designData in this study were obtained through semi-structured interviews with GPs participating in an intervention project, as well as observations of clinical encounters.

resultsFrom the empirical data, we identified three dimensions of respect: respect for the patient's autonomy, respect for professional authority and respect as a mutual exchange. A balance of respect influenced trust in the relationship between GP and patients and the transfer of power in the encounter. The GPs articulated that a balance was needed in preventive health checks in order to establish trust and thus retain the patient in the clinic. One way this balance of respect was carried out was with the use of humour.

conclusionsTo retain patients without formal education in the clinical encounter, the GPs balanced trust and power executed through three dimensions of respect. In this study, retaining patients was equivalent to maintaining a trusting relationship. A strategic use of the three dimensions of respect was applied to balance trust and power and thus build or maintain a trusting relationship with patients. KEY POINTS   Little is known about how strategies for retaining patients are acted out by GPs in preventive health checks.  •  Retaining patients requires a balance of trust and power, which is executed through three dimensions of respect by the GPs.  •  Challenges of recruiting and retaining patients in public health initiatives might be associated with the balance of respect.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersPatient DropoutsPhysician-Patient RelationsPower, PsychologicalPreventive Health ServicesTrustAdultEducational StatusFamily PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonhoodDenmarkgeneral practicephysician–patient relationsprofessional rolequalitative researchTrust

Identifiers

PMID28277053
PMCPMC5361424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.