ArticleLab on a chip2017
Isolation and concentration of bacteria from blood using microfluidic membraneless dialysis and dielectrophoresis.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Bacterial Separation and Enrichment from Blood for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent advances in the biosensing platforms for sepsis diagnosis.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Computational analysis on design and optimization of low-frequency dielectrophoretic microfluidic lab on a chip forBioImpacts : BI · 2026Article
- Rapid culture-free diagnosis of clinical pathogens via integrated microfluidic-Raman micro-spectroscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Expanding the Genome in a Bottle Truth Set: Detection and Validation of Novel Low-frequency Variants Using High-accuracy NanoSeq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Isolation Techniques of Micro/Nano-Scaled Species for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Visual and Quantitative Analysis of the Trapping Volume in Dielectrophoresis of Nanoparticles.Nano letters · 2024Article
- Portable dielectrophoresis for biology: ADEPT facilitates cell trapping, separation, and interactions.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Development of an Optically Induced Dielectrophoresis (ODEP) Microfluidic System for High-Performance Isolation and Purification of Bacteria.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Challenge of material haemocompatibility for microfluidic blood-contacting applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Rapid species identification of pathogenic bacteria from a minute quantity exploiting three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging and artificial neural network.Light, science & applications · 2022Article
- Methods of Generating Dielectrophoretic Force for Microfluidic Manipulation of Bioparticles.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Review
- Dielectrophoresis: Developments and applications from 2010 to 2020.Electrophoresis · 2021Review
- Improvement of Background Solution for Optically Induced Dielectrophoresis-Based Cell Manipulation in a Microfluidic System.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Innovative optofluidics and microscopy-based rapid analysis of pathogens.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- High-Sensitivity in Dielectrophoresis Separations.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Gradient acoustic focusing of sub-micron particles for separation of bacteria from blood lysate.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Light-induced assembly of living bacteria with honeycomb substrate.Science advances · 2020Article
- Microfluidics-Based Organism Isolation from Whole Blood: An Emerging Tool for Bloodstream Infection Diagnosis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2019Review
- DEP-on-a-Chip: Dielectrophoresis Applied to Microfluidic Platforms.Micromachines · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A microfluidic system that combines membraneless microfluidic dialysis and dielectrophoresis to achieve label-free isolation and concentration of bacteria from whole blood is presented. Target bacteria and undesired blood cells are discriminated on the basis of their differential susceptibility to permeabilizing agents that alter the dielectrophoretic behavior of blood cells but not bacteria. The combined membraneless microdialysis and dielectrophoresis system isolated 79 ± 3% of Escherichia coli and 78 ± 2% of Staphylococcus aureus spiked into whole blood at a processing rate of 0.6 mL h
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.