Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28276110›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

Adjustment for survey non-representativeness using record-linkage: refined estimates of alcohol consumption by deprivation in Scotland.

Emma Gorman, Alastair H Leyland, Gerry McCartney, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Lisa Rutherford, Lesley Graham, Mark Robinson, Linsay Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adjusting for non-response in the Finnish Drinking Habits Survey.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma GormanMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alastair H LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Gerry McCartneyNHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lisa RutherfordScotCen Social Research, Edinburgh, UK.
Lesley GrahamInformation Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Mark RobinsonDepartment of Economics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Linsay GrayMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/J013498/1Medical Research Council MC_EX_UU_MR/J013498/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15Medical Research Council MR/J013498/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAnalytical approaches to addressing survey non-participation bias typically use only demographic information to improve estimates. We applied a novel methodology which uses health information from data linkage to adjust for non-representativeness. We illustrate the method by presenting adjusted alcohol consumption estimates for Scotland.

designData on consenting respondents to the Scottish Health Surveys (SHeSs) 1995-2010 were linked confidentially to routinely collected hospital admission and mortality records. Synthetic observations representing non-respondents were created using general population data. Multiple imputation was performed to compute adjusted alcohol estimates given a range of assumptions about the missing data. Adjusted estimates of mean weekly consumption were additionally calibrated to per-capita alcohol sales data.

settingScotland.

participants13 936 male and 18 021 female respondents to the SHeSs 1995-2010, aged 20-64 years. MEASUREMENTS: Weekly alcohol consumption, non-, binge- and problem-drinking.

findingsInitial adjustment for non-response resulted in estimates of mean weekly consumption that were elevated by up to 17.8% [26.5 units (18.6-34.4)] compared with corrections based solely on socio-demographic data [22.5 (17.7-27.3)]; other drinking behaviour estimates were little changed. Under more extreme assumptions the overall difference was up to 53%, and calibrating to sales estimates resulted in up to 88% difference. Increases were especially pronounced among males in deprived areas.

conclusionsThe use of routinely collected health data to reduce bias arising from survey non-response resulted in higher alcohol consumption estimates among working-age males in Scotland, with less impact for females. This new method of bias reduction can be generalized to other surveys to improve estimates of alternative harmful behaviours.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedScotlandYoung AdultAlcohol consumptionalcohol-related harmbiasepidemiologyhealth surveysnon-participationrecord-linkageScotland

Identifiers

PMID28276110
PMCPMC5467727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.