Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275457›Full record

ArticleJournal of virus eradication2017

Willingness to participate and take risks in HIV cure research: survey results from 400 people living with HIV in the US.

Karine Dubé, David Evans, Laurie Sylla, Jeff Taylor, Bryan J Weiner, Asheley Skinner, Harsha Thirumurthy, Joseph D Tucker, Stuart Rennie, Sandra B Greene

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karine DubéUniversity of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
David EvansDelaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), Los Angeles, CA, USA; Project Inform, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Laurie SylladefeatHIV CAB , Seattle , USA.
Jeff TaylorCollaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB , Palm Springs , USA.
Bryan J WeinerUniversity of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Asheley SkinnerUniversity of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), Durham, NC, USA.
Harsha ThirumurthyUniversity of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Joseph D TuckerUNC Project China, Guangzhou, China; UNC Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stuart RennieDepartment of Social Medicine , UNC Bioethics Center , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Sandra B GreeneUniversity of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDelaney AIDS Research Enterprise · USDesert AIDS Project · USSeattle University · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Using NK Cells to eliminate the latent HIV reservoirU19AI096113 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LUCIW, PAUL · 2011 to 2015
$39.5M
Viral reservoirs and sanctuaries in HAART - treated patients: role and mechanismsU19AI096109 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PALMER, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2015
$29.5M
Cell and Gene Therapy for HIV CureUM1AI126623 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI JEROME, KEITH R, KIEM, HANS-PETER · 2016 to 2020
$24.2M
ZFN-Modified Stem Cells for HIV EradicationU19AI096111 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI JEROME, KEITH R · 2011 to 2015
$20.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Unintended and Intended Implications of HIV Cure: A Social and Ethical AnalysisR01AI108366 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RENNIE, STUART, TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Mentoring Multidisciplinary Global HIV Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AI143471 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph David Tucker · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI143471NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108366NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096109NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096111NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096113NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI126623NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParticipation in early-phase HIV cure studies includes clinical risks with little to no likelihood of clinical benefit. Examining the willingness of people living with HIV to participate is important to guide study design and informed consent. Our study examined the overall willingness of people living with HIV to participate in HIV cure research in the US, focusing on perceived risks and benefits of participation.

methodsWe undertook an online survey of adults living with HIV in the US. Survey questions were developed based on previous research and a scoping review of the literature. We quantitatively assessed individuals' perceived risks and benefits of HIV cure-related research and respondents' willingness to participate in different modalities of HIV cure studies.

resultsWe recruited 409 study participants of whom 400 were eligible for the study and were included in the analysis (nine were not eligible due to self-declared HIV-negative status). We found >50% willingness to participate in 14 different types of HIV cure studies. Perceived clinical benefits and social benefits were important motivators, while personal clinical risks appeared to deter potential participation. Roughly two-thirds of survey respondents (68%) indicated that they were somewhat willing to stop treatment as part of HIV cure research. In the bivariate models, females, African Americans/blacks, Hispanics, individuals in the lowest income bracket, people living with HIV for longer periods of their lives, and people who were self-perceived 'very healthy' were less willing to participate in certain types of HIV cure studies than others. Multivariate results showed the perceived benefits (adjusted odds ratios >1) and perceived risks (adjusted odds ratios <1) acted as potential motivators and deterrents to participation, respectively.

conclusionOur study is the first attempt to quantify potential motivators and deterrents of participation in HIV cure research in the US using perceived risks and benefits. The results offer guidance to HIV cure researchers and developers of interventions about the beneficial and detrimental characteristics of HIV cure strategies that are most meaningful to people living with HIV. The study also highlights new potential lines of inquiry for further social science and ethics research.

Indexed as

HIV cure researchperceived benefitsperceived riskswillingness to participate

Identifiers

PMID28275457
PMCPMC5337420
OpenAlexW2997311727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.