Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275449›Full record

ArticleJournal of virus eradication2016

Epidemiology of HIV, programmatic progress and gaps in last 10 years in Nepal.

Tarun Paudel, Nihal Singh, Megha Raj Banjara, Sambhu Prasad Kafle, Yadu Chandra Ghimire, Bhesh Raj Pokharel, Bir Bahadur Rawal, Komal Badal, Madhav Chaulagain, Razia Pendse and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Establishing HIV transmission pathways in Bhutan: a modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarun PaudelNational Centre for AIDS and STI Control , Department of Health Services , Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal.
Nihal SinghCommunicable Diseases , WHO Country Office for Nepal , Lalitpur , Nepal.
Megha Raj BanjaraTribhuvan University , Central Department of Microbiology , Kathmandu , Nepal.
Sambhu Prasad KafleNational Centre for AIDS and STI Control , Department of Health Services , Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal.
Yadu Chandra GhimireNational Centre for AIDS and STI Control , Department of Health Services , Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal.
Bhesh Raj PokharelNational Centre for AIDS and STI Control , Department of Health Services , Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal.
Bir Bahadur RawalNational Centre for AIDS and STI Control , Department of Health Services , Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal.
Komal BadalUNAIDS , Nepal.
Madhav ChaulagainNational Centre for AIDS and STI Control , Department of Health Services , Ministry of Health, Government of Nepal.
Razia PendseWHO Regional Office for South-East Asia , New Delhi , India.
Prakash GhimireCommunicable Diseases , WHO Country Office for Nepal , Lalitpur , Nepal.
Government of Nepal · NPTribhuvan University · NPWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia · IN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesNepal has made progress with the control of HIV infection in recent years. There have been changes in epidemiology, programme interventions in different population groups, and changes in policies over the last 10 years, particularly in diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, this review was conducted to identify the effectiveness of different interventions/policies in different sub-populations at risk, targeted towards epidemiology and treatment outcomes for those with HIV infection in Nepal.

methodsThis review was prepared based on a review of published and unpublished documents from the Nepalese HIV infection control programme, published articles in different journals, different survey reports including integrated bio-behavioural surveillance (IBBS) survey reports.

resultsThe prevalence of HIV infection among adults in 2014 was 0.20% with a progressive decreasing trend from 2005. The prevalence of HIV infection among injecting drug users (51.7% in 2005 and 6.4% in 2015 in Kathmandu valley) was relatively high in all years as compared to other risk groups. HIV infection prevalence among women attending antenatal clinics was higher in the year 2006 (0.25%) but there was a decreasing trend in the following years to 2015, when prevalence was 0.077%. Although different interventions were conducted to cover key populations at risk, the coverage in some risk population was very low. HIV testing status among the general population was very low (7.5% among males and 2.9% among females) in 2011. Only one-third of HIV-infected individuals were on ART in 2015, although this proportion has increased since 2005. The share of domestic budget among the total expenditure on HIV control program is below 15%.

conclusionsThere is the need for implementation of control programmes more efficiently and effectively with expanding geographical and population coverage. Surveillance systems should be strengthened to get up-to-date information for evidence-based planning and developing strategies. The domestic budget for HIV control programme should be increased to improve their sustainability.

Indexed as

control programmesepidemiologygapsHIV infectionNepal

Identifiers

PMID28275449
PMCPMC5337412
OpenAlexW3021735205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.