Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275372›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Non-disulfide-Bridge Peptide 5.5 from the Scorpion

Monalisa M Trentini, Rogério C das Neves, Bruno de Paula Oliveira Santos, Roosevelt A DaSilva, Adolfo C Barros de Souza, Márcia R Mortari, Elisabeth F Schwartz, André Kipnis, Ana P Junqueira-Kipnis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Alternatives to Antibiotics againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Looking beyond Typical Treatments for Atypical Mycobacteria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monalisa M TrentiniLaboratory of Immunopathology of Infectious Disease, Tropical Institute of Pathology and Public Health, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Goiás Goiânia, Brazil.
Rogério C das NevesLaboratory of Immunopathology of Infectious Disease, Tropical Institute of Pathology and Public Health, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Goiás Goiânia, Brazil.
Bruno de Paula Oliveira SantosLaboratory of Immunopathology of Infectious Disease, Tropical Institute of Pathology and Public Health, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Goiás Goiânia, Brazil.
Roosevelt A DaSilvaCollaborative Center of Biosystems, Regional Jataí, Federal University of Goiás Goiânia, Brazil.
Adolfo C Barros de SouzaLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília Brasília, Brazil.
Márcia R MortariLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília Brasília, Brazil.
Elisabeth F SchwartzLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília Brasília, Brazil.
André KipnisLaboratory of Immunopathology of Infectious Disease, Tropical Institute of Pathology and Public Health, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Goiás Goiânia, Brazil.
Ana P Junqueira-KipnisLaboratory of Immunopathology of Infectious Disease, Tropical Institute of Pathology and Public Health, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Goiás Goiânia, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-drug resistant microorganisms have been a growing concern during the last decades due to their contribution in mortality rates worldwide. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are broad spectrum antimicrobial agents that display potent microbicidal activity against a wide range of microorganisms. AMPs generally have a rapid mode of action that reduces the risk of resistance developing among pathogens. In this study, an AMP derived from scorpion venom, NDBP-5.5, was evaluated against

Indexed as

AMPantimycobacterial agentsinfectionnon-disulfide bridged peptiderapid-growing mycobacteriascorpion venom

Identifiers

PMID28275372
PMCPMC5319999
OpenAlexW2590252226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.