Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275249›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health policy2017

State and local policies related to sexual orientation in the United States.

Ryan Cramer, Sarah Hexem, Archana LaPollo, Kendra M Cuffe, Harrell W Chesson, Jami S Leichliter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Variation Between LGBT Estimates and State Policy Context.Population research and policy review · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developing a Topology of Syphilis in the United States.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2018
    Article
  12. Psychometric analysis of the Life Worries Scale for a new generation of sexual minority men: The P18 Cohort Study.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan CramerDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. MS E-02, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA. rcramer@cdc.gov.
Sarah HexemPublic Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Archana LaPolloPublic Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kendra M CuffeDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. MS E-02, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA.
Harrell W ChessonDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. MS E-02, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA.
Jami S LeichliterDivision of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. MS E-02, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USPublic Health Management Corporation · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poorer health suffered by lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations may be associated with public policies. We collected the laws that in 2013 prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation from 50 United States (US) states, the District of Columbia (Washington, DC or DC), and the 30 most populous US metropolitan areas. To facilitate future research, we coded certain aspects of these laws to create a dataset. We generated descriptive statistics by jurisdiction type and tested for regional differences in state law using Chi-square tests. Sixteen (31.4 per cent) states prohibited discrimination by all employers based on sexual orientation, 25 states (49.0 per cent) in public employment, 18 states (35.3 per cent) in government contracting, and 21 states (41.2 per cent) in private employment. Twenty-one states prohibited discrimination (41.2 per cent) in housing practices (selling and renting), and 17 (33.3 per cent) in public accommodations. Local (county/city) laws prohibiting discrimination were less common. State laws differed significantly by US census region - West, Midwest, Northeast, and South. Future analyses of these data could examine the impact of these laws on various outcomes, including health among LGB populations.

Indexed as

Local GovernmentSexual BehaviorState GovernmentEmploymentHomophobiaHousingHumansMarriagePublic PolicyUnited Statesdiscriminationlawpolicysame-sex marriagesexual minority healthsexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID28275249
PMCPMC6752226
OpenAlexW2522791969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.