Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A decade of global volcanic SO

S A Carn, V E Fioletov, C A McLinden, C Li, N A Krotkov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
26.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 486 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regional variability but global flux balance in the deep sulfur cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Tracking SOiScience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modest volcanic SONature communications · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Incorporation of volcanic SOGeoscientific model development · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S A CarnDepartment of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.
V E FioletovAir Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
C A McLindenAir Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
C LiEarth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
N A KrotkovAtmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, Code 614, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA.
Environment and Climate Change Canada · CAGoddard Space Flight Center · USMichigan Technological University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global flux of sulfur dioxide (SO

Identifiers

PMID28275238
PMCPMC5343458
OpenAlexW2592226631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.