Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275116›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Retrospective Review of Atypical Femoral Fracture in Metastatic Bone Disease Patients Receiving Denosumab Therapy.

Samantha Peiling Yang, Tae Won B Kim, Patrick J Boland, Azeez Farooki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Atypical Femur Fracture in a Teenager on Chronic Imatinib Therapy.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation and management of atypical femoral fractures: an update of current knowledge.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha Peiling YangDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA Peiling_yang@nuhs.edu.sg.
Tae Won B KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Patrick J BolandDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Azeez FarookiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCooper University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDenosumab therapy is used to reduce skeletal-related events in metastatic bone disease (MBD). There have been reports of atypical femoral fracture (AFF) in osteoporotic patients treated with denosumab but none in the context of higher dose and more frequent denosumab therapy for MBD. The goal of this study was to assess the incidence of AFF in MBD. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 253 patients who received a minimum of 12 doses of denosumab at 120 mg each for MBD. To identify patients with asymptomatic atypical stress reactions in the lateral subtrochanteric femur (which precede fractures), we reviewed the skeletal images of 66 patients who had received at least 21 doses of denosumab for AFF features.

resultsThese patients received a median of 17 doses, with a median treatment duration of 23 months. There was 1 case of undiagnosed clinical AFF detected after chart review and 2 cases of subclinical atypical femoral stress reaction observed on imaging review after 23 doses of denosumab over 33 months, 28 doses over 27 months, and 21 doses over 21 months, respectively. Scout computed tomography films showed diffuse cortical thickening of diaphysis with localized periosteal reaction of lateral femoral cortex. Bone scan and magnetic resonance imaging scan of 2 patients with stress reactions confirmed the diagnosis.

conclusionThe incidence of clinical AFF in this context is 0.4% (1/253; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1%-2.2%), and the incidence of atypical femoral stress reaction based on imaging review is 4.5% (3/66; 95% CI 1.6%-12.5%). Clinicians should be aware of the clinical prodrome (which may or may not be present) and antecedent imaging changes associated with AFF.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DiseasesDenosumabFemaleFemoral FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDenosumabAtypical femoral fracturesDenosumabMetastatic bone disease

Identifiers

PMID28275116
PMCPMC5388375
OpenAlexW2592322859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.