Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28275059›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Differences in postinjury auditory system pathophysiology after mild blast and nonblast acute acoustic trauma.

Nicholas Race, Jesyin Lai, Riyi Shi, Edward L Bartlett

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mitigation of Hearing Damage After Repeated Blast Exposures in Animal Model of Chinchilla.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The rat animal model for noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas RaceWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Jesyin LaiPurdue University Inderdisciplinary Life Science (PULSe) Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and.
Riyi ShiWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Edward L BartlettWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; ebartle@purdue.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-1854
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

INDIANA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025761 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$21.0M
Measurement and modeling of central auditory processing in aged animalsR01DC011580 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, EDWARD · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Biomechanics of Blast InjuryR21NS090244 · NINDS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI SHI, RIYI · 2014 to 2015
$426k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025761NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011580NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS090244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing difficulties are the most commonly reported disabilities among veterans. Blast exposures during explosive events likely play a role, given their propensity to directly damage both peripheral (PAS) and central auditory system (CAS) components. Postblast PAS pathophysiology has been well documented in both clinical case reports and laboratory investigations. In contrast, blast-induced CAS dysfunction remains understudied but has been hypothesized to contribute to an array of common veteran behavioral complaints, including learning, memory, communication, and emotional regulation. This investigation compared the effects of acute blast and nonblast acoustic impulse trauma in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. An array of audiometric tests were utilized, including distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), auditory brain stem responses (ABR), middle latency responses (MLR), and envelope following responses (EFRs). Generally, more severe and persistent postinjury central auditory processing (CAP) deficits were observed in blast-exposed animals throughout the auditory neuraxis, spanning from the cochlea to the cortex. DPOAE and ABR results captured cochlear and auditory nerve/brain stem deficits, respectively. EFRs demonstrated temporal processing impairments suggestive of functional damage to regions in the auditory brain stem and the inferior colliculus. MLRs captured thalamocortical transmission and cortical activation impairments. Taken together, the results suggest blast-induced CAS dysfunction may play a complementary pathophysiological role to maladaptive neuroplasticity of PAS origin. Even mild blasts can produce lasting hearing impairments that can be assessed with noninvasive electrophysiology, allowing these measurements to serve as simple, effective diagnostics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysBlast InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalEvoked Potentials, AuditoryEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMaleOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousRandom AllocationRats, Sprague-Dawleyauditory brain stem responsesblastenvelope following responseshearing lossTBI

Identifiers

PMID28275059
PMCPMC5539456
OpenAlexW2594274063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.