Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28274824›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2017

Extinction after fear memory reactivation fails to eliminate renewal in rats.

Travis D Goode, Crystal M Holloway-Erickson, Stephen Maren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reconsolidation and Fear Extinction: An Update.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Understanding the dynamic and destiny of memories.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular and circuit mechanisms regulating cocaine memory.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  9. No persistent attenuation of fear memories in humans: A registered replication of the reactivation-extinction effect.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Travis D GoodeInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3474, United States.
Crystal M Holloway-EricksonDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3474, United States.
Stephen MarenInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3474, United States; Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3474, United States. Electronic address: maren@tamu.edu.

Funding

Neural Substrates of Contextual Memory in Fear ExtinctionR01MH065961 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MAREN, STEPHEN · 2003 to 2025
$7.9M
Neural Circuits for Reinstatement of FearF31MH107113 · NIMH · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GOODE, TRAVIS DAVID · 2016 to 2017
$66k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH107113NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieving fear memories just prior to extinction has been reported to effectively erase fear memories and prevent fear relapse. The current study examined whether the type of retrieval procedure influences the ability of extinction to impair fear renewal, a form of relapse in which responding to a conditional stimulus (CS) returns outside of the extinction context. Rats first underwent Pavlovian fear conditioning with an auditory CS and footshock unconditional stimulus (US); freezing behavior served as the index of conditioned fear. Twenty-four hours later, the rats underwent a retrieval-extinction procedure. Specifically, 1h prior to extinction (45 CS-alone trials; 44 for rats receiving a CS reminder), fear memory was retrieved by either a single exposure to the CS alone, the US alone, a CS paired with the US, or exposure to the conditioning context itself. Over the next few days, conditional freezing to the extinguished CS was tested in the extinction and conditioning context in that order (i.e., an ABBA design). In the extinction context, rats that received a CS+US trial before extinction exhibited higher levels of conditional freezing than animals in all other groups, which did not differ from one another. In the renewal context, all groups showed renewal, and none of the reactivation procedures reduced renewal relative to a control group that did not receive a reactivation procedure prior to extinction. These data suggest retrieval-extinction procedures may have limited efficacy in preventing fear renewal.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, ClassicalCuesExtinction, PsychologicalFearFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMaleMemoryMemory ConsolidationRatsRats, Long-EvansContextExtinctionFearPostretrieval extinctionRatReconsolidationRelapseRenewal

Identifiers

PMID28274824
PMCPMC5457330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.