Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2017
Phase 1b randomized, double-blind study of namilumab, an anti-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor monoclonal antibody, in mild-to-moderate rheumatoid arthritis.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01317797 (A Phase Ib Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Dose-escalating Trial to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of Repeated Subcutaneous Injections of MT203 in Patients With Mild to Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis on Treatment With Methotrexate), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase Ib Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Dose-escalating Trial to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of Repeated Subcutaneous Injections of MT203 in Patients With Mild to Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis on Treatment With Methotrexate
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Model-Based Meta-Analysis Compares DAS28 Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Effects and Suggests an Expedited Trial Design for Early Clinical Development.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Pooled it
- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody.The British journal of dermatology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and differential effects of TNF- and GM-CSF-targeting biologics in rheumatoid arthritis.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2019Trial
- B Cells or T Cells in the Development and Sustenance of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Who is the Potential Contributor?Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Targeting GM-CSF in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advances in Cytokine-Directed Immunotherapy and Clinical Implications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- GM-CSFTheranostics · 2025Review
- Article
- Monocytes and Macrophages in Spondyloarthritis: Functional Roles and Effects of Current Therapies.Cells · 2022Review
- Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Molecular and Cellular Heterogeneity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- GM-CSF in inflammation.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2020Review
- GM-CSF: A Promising Target in Inflammation and Autoimmunity.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2020Review
- Review
- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inactivation in CAR T-cells prevents monocyte-dependent release of key cytokine release syndrome mediators.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- The Pleiotropic Effects of the GM-CSF Rheostat on Myeloid Cell Differentiation and Function: More Than a Numbers Game.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Emerging therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: focus on monoclonal antibodies.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Microbiota-Dependent Involvement of Th17 Cells in Murine Models of Inflammatory Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNamilumab (AMG203) is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to the GM-CSF ligand. This was a phase 1b, randomized, double-blind study (PRIORA) to assess namilumab in active, mild-to-moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of repeated subcutaneous injections of namilumab in patients with mild-to-moderate RA.
methodsAdults with mild-to-moderate RA on stable methotrexate doses for ≥12 weeks were eligible. Patients received three subcutaneous injections of namilumab 150 or 300 mg, or placebo on days 1, 15, and 29, with 12 weeks' follow-up. Primary objective was safety/tolerability.
resultsPatients in cohort 1 were randomized to namilumab 150 mg (n = 8) or placebo (n = 5). In cohort 2, patients were randomized to namilumab 300 mg (n = 7) or placebo (n = 4). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar across the three groups (namilumab 150 mg: 63%; namilumab 300 mg: 57%; placebo: 56%). TEAEs in ≥10% of patients were nasopharyngitis (17%) and exacerbation/worsening of RA (13%). No anti-namilumab antibodies were detected. The pharmacokinetics of namilumab were linear and typical of a monoclonal antibody with subcutaneous administration. In a post hoc efficacy, per protocol analysis (n = 21), patients randomized to namilumab showed greater improvement in Disease Activity Score 28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein [CRP]), swelling joint counts and tender joint counts compared with placebo. Difference in mean DAS28-CRP changes from baseline between namilumab and placebo favored namilumab at both doses and at all time points. In addition area under the curve for DAS28-CRP was analyzed as time-adjusted mean change from baseline. A significant improvement in DAS28-CRP was shown with namilumab (150 and 300 mg groups combined) compared with placebo at day 43 (p = 0.0117) and also 8 weeks after last dosing at day 99 (p = 0.0154).
conclusionsSubcutaneous namilumab was generally well tolerated. Although namilumab demonstrated preliminary evidence of efficacy, patient numbers were small; phase 2 studies are ongoing.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01317797 . Registered 18 February 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.