Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28274197›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Sparse Proteomics Analysis - a compressed sensing-based approach for feature selection and classification of high-dimensional proteomics mass spectrometry data.

Tim O F Conrad, Martin Genzel, Nada Cvetkovic, Niklas Wulkow, Alexander Leichtle, Jan Vybiral, Gitta Kutyniok, Christof Schütte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MarkerMap: nonlinear marker selection for single-cell studies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tim O F ConradDepartment of Mathematics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, Berlin, Germany. conrad@math.fu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-5726
Martin GenzelDepartment of Mathematics, Technische Universität Berlin, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Berlin, Germany.
Nada CvetkovicDepartment of Mathematics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, Berlin, Germany.
Niklas WulkowDepartment of Mathematics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander LeichtleCenter of Laboratory Medicine, Inselspital - Bern University Hospital, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Bern, 24105, Switzerland.
Jan VybiralDepartment of Mathematical Analysis, Charles University, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Prague, Czech Republic.
Gitta KutyniokDepartment of Mathematics, Technische Universität Berlin, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Berlin, Germany.
Christof SchütteDepartment of Mathematics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput proteomics techniques, such as mass spectrometry (MS)-based approaches, produce very high-dimensional data-sets. In a clinical setting one is often interested in how mass spectra differ between patients of different classes, for example spectra from healthy patients vs. spectra from patients having a particular disease. Machine learning algorithms are needed to (a) identify these discriminating features and (b) classify unknown spectra based on this feature set. Since the acquired data is usually noisy, the algorithms should be robust against noise and outliers, while the identified feature set should be as small as possible.

resultsWe present a new algorithm, Sparse Proteomics Analysis (SPA), based on the theory of compressed sensing that allows us to identify a minimal discriminating set of features from mass spectrometry data-sets. We show (1) how our method performs on artificial and real-world data-sets, (2) that its performance is competitive with standard (and widely used) algorithms for analyzing proteomics data, and (3) that it is robust against random and systematic noise. We further demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm to two previously published clinical data-sets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualHumansMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalPancreatic NeoplasmsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationBiomarkerClassificationClinical dataCompressed sensingFeature selectionMachine learningMass spectrometryProteomicsSparsity

Identifiers

PMID28274197
PMCPMC5343371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.