Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28274042›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Wet and Dry Enamel Using Dentin Bonding Agents Containing Various Solvents.

Carounanidy Usha, Sathyanarayanan Ramarao, Bindu Meera John, Praveen Rajesh, S Swatha

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is buffalo enamel a suitable substrate for bond strength tests?Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carounanidy UshaProfessor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences , Puducherry, India .
Sathyanarayanan RamaraoProfessor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences , Puducherry, India .
Bindu Meera JohnReader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences , Puducherry, India .
Praveen RajeshSenior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences , Puducherry, India .
S SwathaPostgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences , Puducherry, India .
Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBonding of composite resin to dentin mandates a wet substrate whereas, enamel should be dry. This may not be easily achievable in intracoronal preparations where enamel and dentin are closely placed to each other. Therefore, Dentin Bonding Agents (DBA) are recommended for enamel and dentinal bonding, where enamel is also left moist. A research question was raised if the "enamel-only" preparations will also benefit from wet enamel bonding and contemporary DBA.

aimThe aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of composite resin, bonded to dry and wet enamel using fifth generation DBA (etch and rinse system) containing various solvents such as ethanol/water, acetone and ethanol. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe crowns of 120 maxillary premolars were split into buccal and lingual halves. They were randomly allocated into four groups of DBA: Group 1-water/ethanol based, Group 2-acetone based, Group 3-ethanol based, Group 4-universal bonding agent (control group). The buccal halves and lingual halves were bonded using the wet bonding and dry bonding technique respectively. After application of the DBAs and composite resin build up, shear bond strength testing was done.

resultsGroup 1 (ethanol/water based ESPE 3M, Adper Single Bond) showed highest bond strength of (23.15 MPa) in dry enamel. Group 2 (acetone based Denstply, Prime and Bond NT, showed equal bond strength in wet and dry enamel condition (18.87 MPa and 18.02 MPa respectively).

conclusionDry enamel bonding and ethanol/water based etch and rinse DBA can be recommended for "enamel-only" tooth preparations.

Indexed as

Dry enamel bondingEnamel-onlyWet bonding

Identifiers

PMID28274042
PMCPMC5324493
OpenAlexW2589041944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.