ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Pooled it
- Global prevalence and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- From nature to clinic: tracking genetic and environmental drivers of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pathogenicity.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Marine-derived Pseudomonas gessardii E2 strain: a novel source of green fluorescent protein with insights into its optimization and purification.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Insights into antibiotic resistance and prevalence ofNew microbes and new infections · 2025Review
- Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Rare Cause of Paediatric Endogenous Endophthalmitis.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Article
- Multicenter epidemiology ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Co-regulation of Thermosensor Pathogenic Factors by C-di-GMP-Related Two-Component Systems and a cAMP Receptor-like Protein (Clp) inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Infection Trends, Susceptibility Pattern, and Treatment Options forJournal of laboratory physicians · 2023Article
- Article
- A prospective study of microbiological characterization and clinical facets ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2020Article
- Genetic Variants of the DSF Quorum Sensing System inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Clinical Features, Outcomes, and Risk Factors of Bloodstream Infections due toBioMed research international · 2019Article
- Raman-Deuterium Isotope Probing for in-situ identification of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in Thames River.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance ofHealth services research and managerial epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
aimTo determine the prevalence of infection, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and clinical outcome of MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective study conducted over a period of eight months, i.e., October 2015 to May 2016. All clinical samples received in the microbiology laboratory during the study period were processed using standard microbiological procedures.
resultsA total of 16,234 clinical specimens were received in the microbiology laboratory in the study period, with 2,734 pathogenic bacteria isolated. A total of 1,339 (1.7% of total isolates) Gram-negative bacteria were isolated, out of which 414 were non-fermenters. Among the non-fermenters, 23 (5.5%) were
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.