Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28273761›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2018

Teaching Medical Students About "The Conversation": An Interactive Value-Based Advance Care Planning Session.

Hillary D Lum, Joanna Dukes, Skotti Church, Jean Abbott, Jean M Youngwerth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Navigating birth plans: illuminating neonatal provider perspectives in prenatally diagnosed complex fetal anomalies.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hillary D Lum1 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Joanna Dukes1 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Skotti Church1 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jean Abbott3 Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Jean M Youngwerth1 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Refining an Advance Care Planning Group Visit intervention – a novel intervention to engage older adults in advance care planningK76AG054782 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LUM, HILLARY · 2016 to 2019
$864k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG054782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) promotes care consistent with patient wishes. Medical education should teach how to initiate value-based ACP conversations.

objectiveTo develop and evaluate an ACP educational session to teach medical students a value-based ACP process and to encourage students to take personal ACP action steps.

designGroups of third-year medical students participated in a 75-minute session using personal reflection and discussion framed by The Conversation Starter Kit. The Conversation Project is a free resource designed to help individuals and families express their wishes for end-of-life care. SETTING AND

participantsOne hundred twenty-seven US third-year medical students participated in the session. MEASUREMENTS: Student evaluations immediately after the session and 1 month later via electronic survey.

resultsMore than 90% of students positively evaluated the educational value of the session, including rating highly the opportunities to reflect on their own ACP and to use The Conversation Starter Kit. Many students (65%) reported prior ACP conversations. After the session, 73% reported plans to discuss ACP, 91% had thought about preferences for future medical care, and 39% had chosen a medical decision maker. Only a minority had completed an advance directive (14%) or talked with their health-care provider (1%). One month later, there was no evidence that the session increased students' actions regarding these same ACP action steps.

conclusionA value-based ACP educational session using The Conversation Starter Kit successfully engaged medical students in learning about ACP conversations, both professionally and personally. This session may help students initiate conversations for themselves and their patients.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningTerminal CareAdvance DirectivesCommunicationEducation, MedicalHumansadvance care planningmedical educationmedical studentpalliative carepatient–provider communicationperson-centered learning

Identifiers

PMID28273761
PMCPMC5730505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.