ArticleJAMA dermatology2017
Traumatic Scarring.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light emitting diode-red light for reduction of post-surgical scarring: Results from a dose-ranging, split-face, randomized controlled trial.Journal of biophotonics · 2021Trial
- Effectiveness and safety of Chinese traditional medicine Ulcer Ointment for skin ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Fractional 1064 nm Nd: YAG picosecond lasers for the treatment of traumatic scars: a retrospective study.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- Article
- Advances in Photoelectric Therapy for the Early Intervention and Treatment of Traumatic Scars.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Review
- Ultrasound measurements of pathological and physiological skin thickness: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The IL-4/IL-13 axis in skin fibrosis and scarring: mechanistic concepts and therapeutic targets.Archives of dermatological research · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.