Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28273238›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

Evaluation of self-perception of mechanical ventilation knowledge among Brazilian final-year medical students, residents and emergency physicians.

Fernando Sabia Tallo, Simone de Campos Vieira Abib, Alexandre Jorgi de Andrade Negri, Paulo Cesar, Renato Delascio Lopes, Antônio Carlos Lopes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Joint statement on evidence-based practices in mechanical ventilation: suggestions from two Brazilian medical societies.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Implementation of Tele-ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 pandemic and mechanical ventilation: facing the present, designing the future.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of a respiratory ICU rotation on resident knowledge and confidence in managing mechanical ventilation.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Article
  18. Patient-ventilator asynchrony.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Sabia TalloUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Cirurgia, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Simone de Campos Vieira AbibUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Cirurgia, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Jorgi de Andrade NegriUniversidade Federal da Paraíba, Departamento de Cardiologia, João Pessoa/PB, Brazil.
Paulo CesarUniversidade Evangélica de Anapolis, Anapolis/GO, Brazil.
Renato Delascio LopesDuke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Antônio Carlos LopesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Cirurgia, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRClinical Research Institute · USUniversidade Evangelica de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: To present self-assessments of knowledge about mechanical ventilation made by final-year medical students, residents, and physicians taking qualifying courses at the Brazilian Society of Internal Medicine who work in urgent and emergency settings.

methods: A 34-item questionnaire comprising different areas of knowledge and training in mechanical ventilation was given to 806 medical students, residents, and participants in qualifying courses at 11 medical schools in Brazil. The questionnaire's self-assessment items for knowledge were transformed into scores.

results: The average score among all participants was 21% (0-100%). Of the total, 85% respondents felt they did not receive sufficient information about mechanical ventilation during medical training. Additionally, 77% of the group reported that they would not know when to start noninvasive ventilation in a patient, and 81%, 81%, and 89% would not know how to start volume control, pressure control and pressure support ventilation modes, respectively. Furthermore, 86.4% and 94% of the participants believed they would not identify the basic principles of mechanical ventilation in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome, respectively, and would feel insecure beginning ventilation. Finally, 77% said they would fear for the safety of a patient requiring invasive mechanical ventilation under their care.

conclusion: Self-assessment of knowledge and self-perception of safety for managing mechanical ventilation were deficient among residents, students and emergency physicians from a sample in Brazil.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRespiration, ArtificialSelf-AssessmentBrazilClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementEmergency MedicineHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyStudents, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28273238
PMCPMC5304362
OpenAlexW2593264619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.