Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28273235›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

Comparisons of serum miRNA expression profiles in patients with diabetic retinopathy and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Jianping Ma, Jufang Wang, Yanfen Liu, Changyi Wang, Donghui Duan, Nanjia Lu, Kaiyue Wang, Lu Zhang, Kaibo Gu, Sihan Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Type 2 Diabetes Retinopathy: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Serum miR-195-5p is upregulated in gestational diabetes mellitus.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Plasma levels of miR-29b and miR-200b in type 2 diabetic retinopathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jianping MaShenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen, 518054, China.
Jufang WangNingbo Medical Center Lihuili Eastern Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Ningbo 315040, China.
Yanfen LiuNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.
Changyi WangShenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen, 518054, China.
Donghui DuanNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.
Nanjia LuNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.
Kaiyue WangNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.
Lu ZhangNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.
Kaibo GuNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.
Sihan ChenShenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen, 518054, China.
Tao ZhangShenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Shenzhen, 518054, China.
Dingyun YouKunming Medical University, Department of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China.
Liyuan HanNingbo University, School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo 315211, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the expression levels of serum miRNAs in diabetic retinopathy and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

methods: Serum miRNA expression profiles from diabetic retinopathy cases (type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic retinopathy) and type 2 diabetes mellitus controls (type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without diabetic retinopathy) were examined by miRNA-specific microarray analysis. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to validate the significantly differentially expressed serum miRNAs from the microarray analysis of 45 diabetic retinopathy cases and 45 age-, sex-, body mass index- and duration-of-diabetes-matched type 2 diabetes mellitus controls. The relative changes in serum miRNA expression levels were analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCt method.

results: A total of 5 diabetic retinopathy cases and 5 type 2 diabetes mellitus controls were included in the miRNA-specific microarray analysis. The serum levels of miR-3939 and miR-1910-3p differed significantly between the two groups in the screening stage; however, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction did not reveal significant differences in miRNA expression for 45 diabetic retinopathy cases and their matched type 2 diabetes mellitus controls.

conclusion: Our findings indicate that miR-3939 and miR-1910-3p may not play important roles in the development of diabetic retinopathy; however, studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyGene Expression ProfilingHumansMicroRNAsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID28273235
PMCPMC5304385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.