Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28272979›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Efficacy of phase 3 trial of RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine: The need for an alternative development plan.

Shima Mahmoudi, Hossein Keshavarz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breadth of Antibodies toFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  9. [Malarial antigens in the era of mRNA vaccines].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Hetero-Multimeric Chitinase-ContainingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Generation of a Genetically Modified ChimericFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Immune Responses to the Sexual Stages ofFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shima Mahmoudia Pediatric Infectious Disease Research Center , Tehran University of Medical Science , Tehran , Iran.
Hossein Keshavarzb Center for Research of Endemic Parasites of Iran (CREPI) , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although vaccines would be the ideal tool for control, prevention, elimination, and eradication of many infectious diseases, developing of parasites vaccines such as malaria vaccine is very complex. The most advanced malaria vaccine candidate RTS,S, a pre-erythrocytic vaccine, has been recommended for licensure by EMEA. The results of this phase III trial suggest that this candidate malaria vaccine has relatively little efficacy, and the vaccine apparently will not meet the goal of malaria eradication by itself. Since there are many vaccine candidates in the pipeline

Indexed as

Malaria VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansInfantMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalePlasmodium falciparumVaccinationVaccine PotencyMalaria VaccinesefficacyRTSS/AS01 malaria vaccinevaccine development

Identifiers

PMID28272979
PMCPMC5612527
OpenAlexW2593503323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.