Trial reportClinical cardiology2017
Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.
Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05080504 (Heart Failure Monitoring With Eko Electronic Stethoscopes), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Heart Failure Monitoring With Eko Electronic Stethoscopes (CardioMEMS)
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Economic evaluation and costs of remote patient monitoring for cardiovascular disease in the United States: a systematic review.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Pooled it
- Use of novel non-invasive techniques and biomarkers to guide outpatient management of fluid overload and reduce hospital readmission: systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Health State Utilities of Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Literature Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of the utilization of telemedicine for patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in chronic heart failure: effects across clinically relevant subgroups in the MONITOR-HF trial.European heart journal · 2024Trial
- Within Clinic Reliability and Usability of a Voice-Based Amazon Alexa Administration of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ 9).Journal of medical systems · 2022Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- A Scoping Review of Methods for Extrapolating Costs and Effects in Economic Evaluations of Remote Monitoring.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Review
- Remote Patient Monitoring and Connected Technologies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Heart Failure Readmission Prevention Strategies-A Comparative Review of Medications, Devices, and Other Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Heart Failure Management System in the United States.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- Advances in Cardiovascular Wearable Devices.Biosensors · 2024Review
- The favourable alliance between CardioMEMS and levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Assessing the impact of haemodynamic monitoring with CardioMEMS on heart failure patients: a cost-benefit analysis.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Implementation of an epicardial implantable MEMS sensor for continuous and real-time postoperative assessment of left ventricular activity in adult minipigs over a short- and long-term period.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Markov modeling for cost-effectiveness using federated health data network.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- An Era of Digital Healthcare-A Comprehensive Review of Sensor Technologies and Telehealth Advancements in Chronic Heart Failure Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality in the United States and presents a substantial economic burden. A recently approved implantable wireless pulmonary artery pressure remote monitor, the CardioMEMS HF System, has been shown to be effective in reducing hospitalizations among New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III HF patients. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of this remote monitoring technology compared to standard of care treatment for HF. A Markov cohort model relying on the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in NYHA Class III Heart Failure Patients) clinical trial for mortality and hospitalization data, published sources for cost data, and a mix of CHAMPION data and published sources for utility data, was developed. The model compares outcomes over 5 years for implanted vs standard of care patients, allowing patients to accrue costs and utilities while they remain alive. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty in input parameters. The CardioMEMS HF System was found to be cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $44,832 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analysis found the model was sensitive to the device cost and to whether mortality benefits were sustained, although there were no scenarios in which the cost/QALY exceeded $100,000. Compared with standard of care, the CardioMEMS HF System was cost-effective when leveraging trial data to populate the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.