Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28272761›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2017

Accuracy in the quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effects.

Xiao-Yong Zhang, Feng Wang, Hua Li, Junzhong Xu, Daniel F Gochberg, John C Gore, Zhongliang Zu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effective Modeling of Continuous WaveMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Yong ZhangVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-1077
Feng WangVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hua LiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Junzhong XuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Daniel F GochbergVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
John C GoreVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Zhongliang ZuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

MRI Diffusion in Tumors Using Oscillating GradientsR01CA109106 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI XU, JUNZHONG · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
Proton Relaxation and Exchange Contrast in MRIR01EB024525 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
CERT Imaging of CancerR01CA184693 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOCHBERG, DANIEL F · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
CERT Imaging of MuscleR01EB017767 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOCHBERG, DANIEL F · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
MRI of Mobile Protein and Immobile Metabolite via Magnetization Rotation TransferR21EB017873 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2013 to 2014
$424k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109106NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184693NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017767NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024525NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB017873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects, including dipole-dipole mediated relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer, is important for applications and studies of molecular concentration and transfer rate (and thereby pH or temperature). Although several quantification methods, such as Lorentzian difference (LD) analysis, multiple-pool Lorentzian fits, and the three-point method, have been extensively used in several preclinical and clinical applications, the accuracy of these methods has not been evaluated. Here we simulated multiple-pool Z spectra containing the pools that contribute to the main CEST and rNOE saturation transfer signals in the brain, numerically fit them using the different methods, and then compared their derived CEST metrics with the known solute concentrations and exchange rates. Our results show that the LD analysis overestimates contributions from amide proton transfer (APT) and intermediate exchanging amine protons; the three-point method significantly underestimates both APT and rNOE saturation transfer at -3.5 ppm (NOE(-3.5)). The multiple-pool Lorentzian fit is more accurate than the other two methods, but only at lower irradiation powers (≤1 μT at 9.4 T) within the range of our simulations. At higher irradiation powers, this method is also inaccurate because of the presence of a fast exchanging CEST signal that has a non-Lorentzian lineshape. Quantitative parameters derived from in vivo images of rodent brain tumor obtained using an irradiation power of 1 μT were also compared. Our results demonstrate that all three quantification methods show similar contrasts between tumor and contralateral normal tissue for both APT and the NOE(-3.5). However, the quantified values of the three methods are significantly different. Our work provides insight into the fitting accuracy obtainable in a complex tissue model and provides guidelines for evaluating other newly developed quantification methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsAminesAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular ImagingProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyRatsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAminesBiomarkers, Tumoramide proton transfer (APT)chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)Lorentzian fitnuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE)

Identifiers

PMID28272761
PMCPMC5490367
OpenAlexW2593499406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.