Trial reportJournal of hospital medicine2017
A Time and Motion Study of Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Obtaining Admission Medication Histories.
Trial report in Journal of hospital medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02026453 (Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians to Improve Admission Medication History Accuracy), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians to Improve Admission Medication History Accuracy
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medications and patient safety in the trauma setting: a systematic review.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Pooled it
- Improving admission medication reconciliation with pharmacists or pharmacy technicians in the emergency department: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ quality & safety · 2018Trial
- Roles and impact of pharmacy technicians on hospital wards: a systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical technical assistants on hospital wards: Qualitative interdisciplinary perspectives.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Best possible medication history interview guide: a rapid scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Investigating the Effects of Pharmacist Involvement on Emergency Department Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2026Article
- Implications of pharmacy students' involvement in collecting the best possible medication histories in hospital settings: A scoping review.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2025Article
- A multi-site evaluation of clinical pharmacist time, motion, interventions and interruptions.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Medication reconciliationEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023Article
- Exploring pharmacists' perspectives on preparing discharge medicine lists: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Detecting direct oral anticoagulants in trauma patients using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: A novel approach to medication reconciliation.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2020Observational
- Medication reconciliation: time to save? A cross-sectional study from one acute hospital.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacists' admission medication histories (AMHs) are known to reduce adverse drug events (ADEs). Pharmacist-supervised pharmacy technicians (PSPTs) have also been used in this role. Nonetheless, few studies estimate the costs of utilizing PSPTs to obtain AMHs. We used time and motion methodology to study the time and cost required for pharmacists and PSPTs to obtain AMHs for patients at high risk for ADEs. Pharmacists and PSPTs required 58.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.9-70.1) and 79.4 (95% CI, 59.1-99.8) minutes per patient, respectively (P = 0.14). PSPT-obtained AMHs also required 26.0 (95% CI, 14.9-37.1) minutes of pharmacist supervision per patient. Based on 2015 US Bureau of Labor Statistics wage data, we estimated the cost of having pharmacists and PSPTs obtain AMHs to be $55.91 (95% CI, 44.9-67.0) and $45.00 (95% CI, 29.7-60.4), respectively, which included pharmacist supervisory cost, per patient (P = 0.32). Thus, we found no statistically significant difference in time or cost between the two provider types. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:180-183.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.