Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28272536›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2017

Prediction of years of life after diagnosis of breast cancer using omics and omic-by-treatment interactions.

Agustín González-Reymúndez, Gustavo de Los Campos, Lucía Gutiérrez, Sophia Y Lunt, Ana I Vazquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phosphorescent Metal Halide Nanoclusters for Tunable Photodynamic Therapy.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complex-Trait Prediction in the Era of Big Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agustín González-ReymúndezQuantGen Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Gustavo de Los CamposQuantGen Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Lucía GutiérrezDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Sophia Y LuntDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Ana I VazquezQuantGen Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

Training Interventions and Genetics of Exercise Response (TIGER)R01DK062148 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BRAY, MOLLY · 2003 to 2014
$6.0M
Statistical Tools for Whole-Genome Prediction of Complex Traits and DiseasesR01GM101219 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2017
$1.6M
Factors Affecting Prediction Accuracy of Complex Human Traits and DiseasesR01GM099992 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062148NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099992NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common type of cancer and a major cause of death for women. Commonly, BC patients are assigned to risk groups based on the combination of prognostic and prediction factors (eg, patient age, tumor size, tumor grade, hormone receptor status, etc). Although this approach is able to identify risk groups with different prognosis, patients are highly heterogeneous in their response to treatments. To improve the prediction of BC patients, we extended clinical models (including prognostic and prediction factors with whole-omic data) to integrate omics profiles for gene expression and copy number variants (CNVs). We describe a modeling framework that is able to incorporate clinical risk factors, high-dimensional omics profiles, and interactions between omics and non-omic factors (eg, treatment). We used the proposed modeling framework and data from METABRIC (Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer Consortium) to assess the impact on the accuracy of BC patient survival predictions when omics and omic-by-treatment interactions are being considered. Our analysis shows that omics and omic-by-treatment interactions explain a sizable fraction of the variance on survival time that is not explained by commonly used clinical covariates. The sizable interaction effects observed, together with the increase in prediction accuracy, suggest that whole-omic profiles could be used to improve prognosis prediction among BC patients.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, StatisticalPharmacogeneticsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28272536
PMCPMC5437894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.