Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28272367›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017

How Open Data Shapes In Silico Transporter Modeling.

Floriane Montanari, Barbara Zdrazil

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Floriane MontanariPharmacoinformatics Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. floriane.montanari@univie.ac.at.
Barbara ZdrazilPharmacoinformatics Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. barbara.zdrazil@univie.ac.at.
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical compound bioactivity and related data are nowadays easily available from open data sources and the open medicinal chemistry literature for many transmembrane proteins. Computational ligand-based modeling of transporters has therefore experienced a shift from local (quantitative) models to more global, qualitative, predictive models. As the size and heterogeneity of the data set rises, careful data curation becomes even more important. This includes, for example, not only a tailored cutoff setting for the generation of binary classes, but also the proper assessment of the applicability domain. Powerful machine learning algorithms (such as multi-label classification) now allow the simultaneous prediction of multiple related targets. However, the more complex, the less interpretable these models will get. We emphasize that transmembrane transporters are very peculiar, some of which act as off-targets rather than as real drug targets. Thus, careful selection of the right modeling technique is important, as well as cautious interpretation of results. We hope that, as more and more data will become available, we will be able to ameliorate and specify our models, coming closer towards function elucidation and the development of safer medicine.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularCarrier ProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinLigandsProtein BindingQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipCarrier ProteinsLigandsapplicability domaincomputational modelingdata curationmachine learningmulti-label classificationopen datatransport proteins

Identifiers

PMID28272367
PMCPMC5553104
OpenAlexW2594726253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.