ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Imprinting Technology in Electrochemical Biomimetic Sensors.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecularly imprinted polyvinylbenzoic acid based sensor for highly sensitive detection of acute lymphoblastic leukemia biomarker.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Progress and Perspectives of Molecular Imprinting Methods in the Development of Electrochemical Protein Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Small Toxic Molecule Detection and Elimination Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs).Biosensors · 2025Review
- Aspects of Electrochemical Biosensors Using Affinity Assays.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Article
- Liquid Redox Probe-Free Plastic Antibody Development for Malaria Biomarker Recognition.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Molecularly imprinted polymer-based electrochemical sensors for monitoring the persistent organic pollutants chlorophenols.RSC advances · 2024Review
- An electrochemically synthesized molecularly imprinted polymer for highly selective detection of breast cancer biomarker CA 15-3: a promising point-of-care biosensor.RSC advances · 2024Article
- An Innovative Approach for Tailoring Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Biosensors-Application to Cancer Antigen 15-3.Biosensors · 2024Article
- SERS biosensor with plastic antibodies for detection of a cancer biomarker protein.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Imprinted Hydrogel Nanoparticles for Protein Biosensing: A Review.ACS sensors · 2023Review
- Polyurethane Application to Transform Screen-Printed Electrode for Rapid Identification of Histamine Isolated from Fish.Scientifica · 2023Article
- Electrochemical sensing of macromolecules based on molecularly imprinted polymers: challenges, successful strategies, and opportunities.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- Artificial Biomimetic Electrochemical Assemblies.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Plastic Antibody of Polypyrrole/Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes on Screen-Printed Electrodes for Cystatin C Detection.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Molecular Imprinting on Nanozymes for Sensing Applications.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Molecularly Imprinted Polyscopoletin for the Electrochemical Detection of the Chronic Disease Marker Lysozyme.Biosensors · 2020Article
- MIPs for commercial application in low-cost sensors and assays - An overview of the current status quo.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2020Article
- How Reliable Is the Electrochemical Readout of MIP Sensors?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Under-Etched Plasmonic Disks on Indium Tin Oxide for Enhanced Refractive Index Sensing on a Combined Electrochemical and Optical Platform.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biosensors are a promising tool offering the possibility of low cost and fast analytical screening in point-of-care diagnostics and for on-site detection in the field. Most biosensors in routine use ensure their selectivity/specificity by including natural receptors as biorecognition element. These materials are however too expensive and hard to obtain for every biochemical molecule of interest in environmental and clinical practice. Molecularly imprinted polymers have emerged through time as an alternative to natural antibodies in biosensors. In theory, these materials are stable and robust, presenting much higher capacity to resist to harsher conditions of pH, temperature, pressure or organic solvents. In addition, these synthetic materials are much cheaper than their natural counterparts while offering equivalent affinity and sensitivity in the molecular recognition of the target analyte. Imprinting technology and biosensors have met quite recently, relying mostly on electrochemical detection and enabling a direct reading of different analytes, while promoting significant advances in various fields of use. Thus, this review encompasses such developments and describes a general overview for building promising biomimetic materials as biorecognition elements in electrochemical sensors. It includes different molecular imprinting strategies such as the choice of polymer material, imprinting methodology and assembly on the transduction platform. Their interface with the most recent nanostructured supports acting as standard conductive materials within electrochemical biomimetic sensors is pointed out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.