SynthesisMedicine2017
Risk factors for dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06475365 (The Effect of Salt Water Gargling on Swallowing Dysfunction Following Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Salt Water Gargling on Swallowing Dysfunction Following Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- National Trends and Risk Factors for Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- How Common is Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery, What Drives it, and Can it be Prevented? An Umbrella Review of Systematic Evidence.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Evaluating Dysphagia Duration and Severity After ACDF in Patients With Underlying Dysphagia - A Prospective, Multicenter Study.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- Reducing Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Insights From a Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
- Single-level cervical disc replacement (CDR) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): A Nationwide matched analysis of complications, 30- and 90-day readmission rates, and cost.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- Comparing zero-profile and conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using finite-element modeling.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Upper cervical anterior fusion to C2 with temporary infrahyoid muscle detachment: a clinical case series and description of surgical technique.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Dysphagia May Attenuate Improvements in Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.International journal of spine surgery · 2022Article
- Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion UsingClinics in orthopedic surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the Effect of Local Steroids in the Retropharyngeal Space After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.Global spine journal · 2021Article
- Characterization of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery.Advances in communication and swallowing · 2021Article
- Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory and Other Dysphagia Measurements in Patients Undergoing ACDF.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020Article
- Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and complications of rhBMP-2 in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 1,539,021 cases from 2003 to 2017 studies.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2020Article
- Dysphagia rates in single- and multiple-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: a meta-analysis.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2020Article
- Complications and Complication Avoidance With Cervical Total Disc Replacement.International journal of spine surgery · 2020Article
- Functionalized Scaffold and Barrier Membrane with Anti-BMP-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in a Canine Model.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- [Dysphagia in cervical spine diseases].HNO · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysphagia is a well-known complication following anterior cervical spine surgery. Although risk factors for dysphagia have been reported in the literature, they still remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with dysphagia following anterior cervical spinal surgery.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2016 for studies examining dysphagia following anterior cervical spinal surgery. Risk factors associated with dysphagia were extracted. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0.
resultsThe final analysis includes a total of 18 distinct studies. The pooled analysis reveals that there are significant differences in female gender (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.76-2.99, P < 0.001), the use of anterior cervical plate (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.05-2.62, P = 0.03), more than 1 surgical level (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.62-2.66, P < 0.001), the upper surgical level at C3/4 (OR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.44-6.55, P = 0.004), and the use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) (OR = 5.52, 95% CI: 2.16-14.10, P < 0.001). However, no significant difference is found in revision surgery (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.60-4.68, P = 0.33), the type of fusion (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.62-1.67, P = 0.95), and cervical disc arthroplasty (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.75-2.51, P = 0.30).
conclusionFemale gender, the use of anterior cervical plate, more than 1 surgical level, the upper surgical level at C3/4, and the use of rhBMP-2 are the risk factors for dysphagia following anterior cervical spinal surgery. However, revision surgery, the type of fusion, and cervical disc arthroplasty are unassociated with dysphagia. Considering the limited number of studies, this conclusion should be interpreted cautiously, and larger scale studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.