Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271949›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2017

COGITA network has constructed a glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms.

Marie Barais, Johannes Hauswaldt, Geert-Jan Dinant, Margje van de Wiel, C F Erik Stolper, Paul Van Royen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Do GPs know more than other doctors?The European journal of general practice · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie Baraisa ERCR SPURBO, Department of General Practice , Université de Bretagne Occidentale , Brest , France.
Johannes Hauswaldtb Department of General Practice , University Medical Center , Göttingen , Germany.
Geert-Jan Dinantc Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Margje van de Wield Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Work and Social Psychology , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
C F Erik Stolperc Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Paul Van Royenf Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care , University of Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of gut feelings in diagnostic reasoning is recognized by most GPs throughout Europe, and probably throughout the world. Studies on this topic have emerged from different countries but there is the risk that authors will use different terms for similar concepts. The European Expert Group on Cognitive and Interactive Processes in Diagnosis and Management in General Practice, COGITA for short, was founded in 2008 to conduct cross-border research in the area of non-analytical diagnostic reasoning. Academic GPs, PhD students, psychologists, linguists and students meet once a year to share their experiences, exchange results and initiate new studies on the topic. A milestone in their research is this publication of a short glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms relating to the gut feelings research topic. It was constructed by the COGITA group members following a literature review, which aimed to define salient terms used in their publications. They described the terms, cross-reviewed the wording and reached consensus within the group. Two sections were created: (1) a diagnostic reasoning section that describes concepts such as analytical and non-analytical reasoning, clinical mind lines, and intuition, and (2) a research methods section describing concepts such as linguistic validity and saturation. The glossary, including relevant literature, has been published on the website http://www.gutfeelingsingeneralpractice.eu . In the future, the glossary will be modified if necessary and completed by members of the COGITA group. [Box: see text].

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingIntuitionTerminology as TopicGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansclinical decision makingdiagnosisGeneral practiceintuitionpattern recognitionuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID28271949
PMCPMC5774265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.