Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271642›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2017

Large-Scale in-House Cell-Based Assay for Evaluating the Serostatus in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Based on New Diagnostic Criteria.

Yeseul Kim, Gayoung Kim, Byung Soo Kong, Ji Eun Lee, Yu Mi Oh, Jae Won Hyun, Su Hyun Kim, AeRan Joung, Byoung Joon Kim, Kyungho Choi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yeseul KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Gayoung KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Byung Soo KongDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ji Eun LeeDivision of Translational and Clinical Research II, Research institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Yu Mi OhDivision of Translational and Clinical Research II, Research institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jae Won HyunDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Su Hyun KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
AeRan JoungDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Byoung Joon KimDepartment of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyungho ChoiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe detection of aquaporin 4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) is now a critical diagnostic criterion for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). To evaluate the serostatus of NMOSD patients based on the 2015 new diagnostic criteria using a new in-house cell-based assay (CBA).

methodsWe generated a stable cell line using internal ribosome entry site-containing bicistronic vectors, which allow the simultaneous expression of two proteins (AQP4 and green fluorescent protein) separately from the same RNA transcript. We performed in-house CBA using serum from 386 patients: 178 NMOSD patients diagnosed according to the new diagnostic criteria without AQP4-IgG, 63 high risk NMOSD patients presenting 1 of the 6 core clinical characteristics of NMOSD but not fulfilling dissemination in space, and 145 patients with other neurological diseases, including 66 with multiple sclerosis. The serostatus of 111 definite and high risk NMOSD patients were also tested using a commercial CBA kit with identical serum to evaluate the correlation between the 2 methods. All assays were performed by two independent and blinded investigators.

resultsOur in-house assay yielded a specificity of 100% and sensitivities of 80% (142 of 178) and 76% (48 of 63) when detecting definite- and high risk NMOSD patients, respectively. The comparison with the commercial CBA kit revealed a correlation for 102 of the 111 patients: no correlation was present in 7 patients who were seronegative using the commercial method but seropositive using the in-house method, and in 2 patients who were seropositive using the commercial method but seronegative using the in-house method.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that our in-house CBA is a highly specific and sensitive method for detecting AQP4-IgG in NMOSD patients.

Indexed as

aquaporin 4aquaporin 4-IgGcell-based immunofluorescence assayneuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Identifiers

PMID28271642
PMCPMC5392460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.