Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271462›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

A Qualitative Study of the Barriers and Opportunities for Adoption of Web-Portals for Doctors and Patients in Russia.

Georgy Kopanitsa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Georgy KopanitsaInstitute Cybernetic Center, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina 30, 634050, Tomsk, Russia. georgy.kopanitsa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-8036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of Web portals has several benefits. They have been proven to enhance communication between patients and health care professionals, allow patients to play a more active role in their own treatment and self-management, increase self-efficiency. Doctors can access patients' medical data and give recommendations to the patients. Some evidence of positive outcomes has been reported including improved clinical indicators and reduced health service use, as well as enhanced feelings of security and increased satisfaction with health and social care services. However, a number of studies have demonstrated that these types of solutions often fail to be successfully implemented and adopted within routine healthcare. The goal of the study was to analyze attitude of tuberculosis patients and doctors and identify perceived opportunities and barriers to operate a Web portal. The perceptions of 30 tuberculosis patients and 18 doctors (10 general practitioners and 8 phthisiatricians) from Tomsk, Russia were collected through semi-structured interviews. The responses were analyzed using grounded theory and thematic analysis, in order to understand the participants' opinions and attitudes towards accepting tuberculosis web-portal in the treatment and rehabilitation process. We have recognized core topics that represented the participants' responses. These core topics indicated that most respondents mentioned "the potential of tuberculosis web-portal to establish a better communication between doctors and patients" and "the increased health status of the patients" as the most valuable outcomes of adopting the tool. Both doctors and patients also expressed their opinions on the usability of the solutions, with no significant concerns reported about its usability. The main barrier we identified was different expectations of doctors and patients: doctors expected that the portal would decrease the amount of paper work and will help them to quickly react in acute cases, however, the patients were disappointed that the portal did not allow them to be able to reach doctors on the 24/7 basis and have a consultation whenever they felt they needed it. Finally, our findings disclosed that participants appreciated the perceived clinical utility of the portal, which could further have an influence on their intention to use it. The findings from our reported study in the area of tuberculosis treatment and rehabilitation suggested that the participants generally accepted the introduction of web-portal for the purpose of reporting health status and getting recommendation from the doctors as an alternative to the traditional doctor visits.

Indexed as

AgedAppointments and SchedulesAttitude to HealthComputer SecurityElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth StatusHumansInternetInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningPatient PortalsPatientsPhysiciansEHREvaluationGrounded theoryQualitative studyWeb portal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.