Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271461›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2017

New approaches for the reliable in vitro assessment of binding affinity based on high-resolution real-time data acquisition of radioligand-receptor binding kinetics.

Markus Zeilinger, Florian Pichler, Lukas Nics, Wolfgang Wadsak, Helmut Spreitzer, Marcus Hacker, Markus Mitterhauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Experimental Nuclear Medicine Meets Tumor Biology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Article
  11. Detecting ligand interactions in real time on living bacterial cells.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  12. [ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Markus ZeilingerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmacy and Experimental Nuclear Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Florian PichlerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmacy and Experimental Nuclear Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas NicsDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmacy and Experimental Nuclear Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang WadsakDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmacy and Experimental Nuclear Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut SpreitzerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marcus HackerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmacy and Experimental Nuclear Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Markus MitterhauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmacy and Experimental Nuclear Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. markus.mitterhauser@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-5272

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 26502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResolving the kinetic mechanisms of biomolecular interactions have become increasingly important in early-phase drug development. Since traditional in vitro methods belong to dose-dependent assessments, binding kinetics is usually overlooked. The present study aimed at the establishment of two novel experimental approaches for the assessment of binding affinity of both, radiolabelled and non-labelled compounds targeting the A

resultsTwo novel real-time cell-binding approaches were successfully developed and established. Both experimental procedures were found to visualize the kinetic binding characteristics with high spatial and temporal resolution, resulting in reliable affinity values, which are in good agreement with values previously reported with traditional methods. Taking into account the lipophilicity of the A

conclusionsBoth kinetic binding approaches comprise tracer administration and subsequent binding to living cells, expressing the dedicated target protein. Therefore, the experiments resemble better the true in vivo physiological conditions and provide important markers of cellular feedback and biological response.

Indexed as

A3RBinding affinityBinding kineticsCell-based ligand interaction analysisKinetic competition assayReal-time cell-binding studies

Identifiers

PMID28271461
PMCPMC5340791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.