Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2017
Improving Weight in People with Serious Mental Illness: The Effectiveness of Computerized Services with Peer Coaches.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Non-pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic drug-related metabolic abnormalities: a systematic narrative review.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Dietary E-Health Interventions for Adults With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Pooled it
- Digital health behaviour change interventions in severe mental illness: a systematic review.Psychological medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of lifestyle interventions to improve weight, physical activity and diet among people with a mental health condition.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Hybrid and Remote Psychosocial Interventions Focused on Weight and Sedentary Behavior Management Among Patients with Severe Mental Illnesses: a Systematic Review.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2022Pooled it
- Scope of Use and Effectiveness of Dietary Interventions for Improving Health-Related Outcomes in Veterans: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Identifying effective characteristics of behavioral weight management interventions for people with serious mental illness: A systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022Pooled it
- Acceptability and feasibility of weight management programmes for adults with severe obesity: a qualitative systematic review.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Motivational interviewing in eHealth and telehealth interventions for weight loss: A systematic review.Preventive medicine · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of interventions aimed at improving the cardiovascular health of people diagnosed with personality disorders.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2019Pooled it
- Implementation of peer specialist services in VA primary care: a cluster randomized trial on the impact of external facilitation.Implementation science : IS · 2021Trial
- Quality of life outcomes of web-based and in-person weight management for adults with serious mental illness.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2020Trial
- Barriers to participation in web-based and in-person weight management interventions for serious mental illness.Psychiatric rehabilitation journal · 2019Trial
- Living Well: An Intervention to Improve Medical Illness Self-Management Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Trial
- Factors Associated With Weight Intervention Participation Among People With Serious Mental Illness.The Journal of nervous and mental disease · 2018Trial
- Impact of Online Weight Management With Peer Coaching on Physical Activity Levels of Adults With Serious Mental Illness.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2018Trial
- Assessing the Use of Wearable Mobile-Monitoring Devices Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: Qualitative Acceptability and Feasibility Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and Feasibility of Self-Monitoring for Weight Management in Individuals With Mental Disorders Using Digital Intervention: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial ("SWIM" Study).JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Non-pharmacologicaL InterVEntions for Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain (RESOLVE) in People Living With Severe Mental Illness: A Realist Synthesis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025Review
- Interactive Effects of Weight Recording Frequency and the Volume of Chat Communication With Health Care Professionals on Weight Loss in mHealth Interventions for Noncommunicable Diseases: Retrospective Observational Study.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with serious mental illness have high rates of obesity and related medical problems, and die years prematurely, most commonly from cardiovascular disease. Specialized, in-person weight management interventions result in weight loss in efficacy trials with highly motivated patients. In usual care, patient enrollment and retention are low with these interventions, and effectiveness has been inconsistent.
objectiveTo determine whether computerized provision of weight management with peer coaching is feasible to deliver, is acceptable to patients, and is more effective than in-person delivery or usual care.
designMixed-methods randomized controlled trial.
participantsTwo hundred seventy-six overweight patients with serious mental illness receiving care at a Veterans Administration medical center.
interventionsPatients were randomized to 1) computerized weight management with peer coaching (WebMOVE), 2) in-person clinician-led weight services, or 3) usual care. Both active interventions offered the same educational content. MAIN MEASURES: Body mass index; and feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. KEY
resultsAt 6 months, in obese patients (n = 200), there was a significant condition by visit effect (F = 4.02, p = 0.02). The WebMOVE group had an average estimated BMI change from baseline to 6 months of 34.9 ± 0.4 to 34.1 ± 0.4. This corresponds to 2.8 kg (6.2 lbs) weight loss (t = 3.2, p = 0.001). No significant change in BMI was seen with either in-person services (t = 0.10, p = 0.92), or usual care (t = -0.25, p = 0.80). The average percentage of modules completed in the WebMOVE group was 49% and in the in-person group was 41% (t = 1.4, p = 0.17). When non-obese patients were included in the analyses, there was a trend towards a condition by visit effect (F = 2.8, p = 0.06). WebMOVE was well received, while the acceptability of in-person services was mixed.
conclusionsComputerized weight management with peer support results in lower weight, and can have greater effectiveness than clinician-led in-person services. This intervention is well received, and could be feasible to disseminate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.