Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271426›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2017

Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m

Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Erin Boundy, Lauren Ferguson, Katherine Erickson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenges in the care and treatment of patients with extreme obesity.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim PetersonEvidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. Kimberly.Peterson4@va.gov.
Johanna AndersonEvidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Erin BoundyEvidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Lauren FergusonEvidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Katherine EricksonEvidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
VA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m

methodsWe searched MEDLINE

resultsAmong 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.

conclusionsThe published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryBiasBody Mass IndexEvidence-Based MedicineHumansObesity, Morbidbariatric surgerysuper obesesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28271426
PMCPMC5359153
OpenAlexW2591757440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.