Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271407›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2017

Three-dimensional eye movement recordings during magnetic vestibular stimulation.

Jorge Otero-Millan, David S Zee, Michael C Schubert, Dale C Roberts, Bryan K Ward

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vestibular-Evoked Cerebral Potentials.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mouse Magnetic-field Nystagmus in Strong Static Magnetic Fields Is Dependent on the Presence of Nox3.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorge Otero-MillanDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-8392
David S ZeeDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael C SchubertDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dale C RobertsDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bryan K WardDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. bward15@jhmi.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human subjects placed in strong magnetic fields such as in an MRI scanner often feel dizzy or vertiginous. Recent studies in humans and animals have shown that these effects arise from stimulation of the labyrinth and are accompanied by nystagmus. Here, we measured the three-dimensional pattern of nystagmus using video eye tracking in five normal human subjects placed in a 7T MRI to infer which semicircular canals are activated by magnetic vestibular stimulation. We found that the nystagmus usually had a torsional as well as a horizontal component. Analysis of the relative velocities of the three eye movement components revealed that the lateral and anterior (superior) canals are the only canals activated, and by a similar amount.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAdultAgedEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNystagmus, PhysiologicSemicircular CanalsLabyrinthMagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic vestibular stimulationVertigoVestibular

Identifiers

PMID28271407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.