Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271388›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2018

Health-Related Predictors of Quality of Life in Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia.

Anwar E Ahmed, Alaa S Almuzaini, Mohannad A Alsadhan, Abdulrahman G Alharbi, Hanin S Almuzaini, Yosra Z Ali, Abdul-Rahman Jazieh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer in Kazakhstan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Determinants of health-related quality of life among Omanis hospitalized patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anwar E AhmedKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ahmedan@ngha.med.sa.
Alaa S AlmuzainiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohannad A AlsadhanCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman G AlharbiCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Al Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Hanin S AlmuzainiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yosra Z AliDepartment of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul-Rahman JaziehDepartment of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on Saudi Arabian cancer patients is a priority at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Because there is limited research on the quality of life (QoL) of Saudi Arabian cancer patients, the aim of this study was to identify the predictors of the QoL in a sample of Saudis with cancer. In August 2016, a cross-sectional study was conducted on 438 patients with a variety of cancer types (145 breast, 109 colorectal, 38 leukemia, 45 lymphoma, and 99 other types) who attended the Oncology Outpatient Clinics at KAMC. Sociodemographics, clinical symptoms, and cancer treatments were collected for each patient. We used the SF-36 instrument to assess QoL. Of the cancer patients studied, 28.4% had a family history of cancer, and, according to subgroup analyses, the elderly, those lacking formal education, the unemployed, those diagnosed with Stage III/IV, and those with metastasis had significantly worse physical functions than the other cancer patients. According to multiple linear regression analyses, cancer patients who exercised regularly tended to have better physical function, emotional role function, vitality, social function, and general health (increase in SF-36 scores of 8.82, 9.75, 5.54, 6.66, and 4.97, respectively). Patients with first-year-after-cancer diagnosis tended to have poor emotional wellbeing, social function, and general health (decrease in SF-36 scores of 5.20, 7.34, and 6.12, respectively). Newly diagnosed cancer patients and patients who did not exercise tended to experience significantly poor QoL in several domains; thus, the effectiveness of exercise must be assessed in Saudi cancer patients as an intervention to improve QoL.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorQuality of LifeAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingSaudi ArabiaFirst-year-cancer diagnosisQoLRegular exerciseSaudi ArabiaSF-36

Identifiers

PMID28271388
PMCPMC6208783
OpenAlexW2592060938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.