SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2017

The impact of metformin use on survival in kidney cancer patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Yang Li, Liyi Hu, Qinghong Xia, Yongqiang Yuan, Yonghua Mi

Open access · hybridFull text readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph read 5 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 5 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.62 (0.45 to 0.86) for cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

5numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Cancer-specific survival (CSS)metformin use vs no metformin usean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · ckd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.620.45 to 0.86P = 0.004
The combined HR suggested that the use of metformin could improve the overall survival (OS) (HR 0.643, 95% CI 0.520-0.795, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 0.618, 95% CI 0.446-0.858, P = 0.004) in kidney cancer patients.
Overall survival (OS)metformin use vs no metformin use, in localized renal cell carcinoma patientsan association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · ckd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.630.44 to 0.91P = 0.014
In subgroup analysis, positive associations were found between metformin use and OS/CSS of localized renal cell carcinoma patients (OS: HR 0.634, 95% CI 0.440-0.913, P = 0.014; CSS: HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.295-0.768, P = 0.002).
Cancer-specific survival (CSS)metformin use vs no metformin use, in localized renal cell carcinoma patientsan association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · ckd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.480.29 to 0.77P = 0.002
In subgroup analysis, positive associations were found between metformin use and OS/CSS of localized renal cell carcinoma patients (OS: HR 0.634, 95% CI 0.440-0.913, P = 0.014; CSS: HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.295-0.768, P = 0.002).
Risk of deathmetformin use vs no metformin usean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · ckd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.710.56 to 0.90P = 0.004
Moreover, we also found that the use of metformin could reduce the risk of death in kidney cancer patients (HR 0.711, 95% CI 0.562-0.899, P = 0.004).
Overall survival (OS)metformin use vs no metformin usean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · ckd, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.640.52 to 0.80P < 0.001
The combined HR suggested that the use of metformin could improve the overall survival (OS) (HR 0.643, 95% CI 0.520-0.795, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 0.618, 95% CI 0.446-0.858, P = 0.004) in kidney cancer patients.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.25no deciding trial · 0 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT000387272,779 enrolled · 1996
HR 0.990.79 to 1.25

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang LiDepartment of Nephrology, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Liyi HuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Qinghong XiaDepartment of Nephrology, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Yongqiang YuanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 402160, China.
Yonghua MiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 402160, China. yonghuami@163.com.
Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

purposeThe effects of metformin on the prognosis of kidney cancer patients with diabetes are in controversial. The present study is conducted to classify the association of metformin use with the survival of patients with kidney cancer.

methodsElectronic databases, namely PubMed and Web of Science, were used to search the eligible studies up to December, 2016. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. It was considered as statistically significant when P value was <0.05.

resultsEight cohorts were eligible for the present meta-analysis, including 254,329 kidney cancer patients. The combined HR suggested that the use of metformin could improve the overall survival (OS) (HR 0.643, 95% CI 0.520-0.795, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 0.618, 95% CI 0.446-0.858, P = 0.004) in kidney cancer patients. In subgroup analysis, positive associations were found between metformin use and OS/CSS of localized renal cell carcinoma patients (OS: HR 0.634, 95% CI 0.440-0.913, P = 0.014; CSS: HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.295-0.768, P = 0.002). Moreover, we also found that the use of metformin could reduce the risk of death in kidney cancer patients (HR 0.711, 95% CI 0.562-0.899, P = 0.004).

conclusionOur findings suggest that the use of metformin is in favor of the prognosis of patients with kidney cancers. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the prognostic value of metformin on kidney cancer patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellDiabetes MellitusDisease-Free SurvivalHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidney NeoplasmsMetforminSurvival RateHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminHazard ratio (HR)Kidney cancerMetforminPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28271326
PMCPMC5443884
OpenAlexW2593712675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.