ArticleIrish journal of medical science2017
An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training and expertise in undertaking assisted vaginal delivery (AVD): a mixed methods systematic review of practitioners views and experiences.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Women's, partners' and healthcare providers' views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review.Reproductive health · 2020Pooled it
- Maternal and neonatal trauma during forceps and vacuum delivery must not be overlooked.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to assess Irish and Canadian obstetricians in training ("trainees") experience, confidence, and comfort in performing operative vaginal delivery (OVD). STUDY
designTrainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the University of Toronto and the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey reviewing experience as primary operator of OVD. Trainee confidence and comfort was self-assessed based upon their last few OVDs.
resultsThe response rate was 55% amongst Canadian trainees (31/56) and 44% amongst Irish trainees (21/48). When comparing Irish with Canadian trainee experience, the median numbers of vacuum and forceps deliveries performed by Irish trainees as primary operator were reported to be higher [125 (range 10-150) vs 20 (range 5-40); p < 0.0001 (ventouse), 45 (range 10-150) vs 6 (range 1-12); p = 0.0001 (forceps)]. Despite this, trainee confidence between the groups did not differ [confidence score: 18.7 (SD 3.2) vs 17.8 (SD 3.5), p = 0.3]. There were some differences regarding comfort in certain aspects of OVD, most notably increased comfort in Irish trainees in pre-procedure assessment skills of OVD.
conclusionWith falling OVD rates worldwide, training experience is declining. Despite higher numbers of OVD within the Irish trainee group, there was no difference in trainee confidence between the two groups. These results suggest that a high number of cases as primary operator may not be required to establish operator confidence in performing a procedure. Irish trainees self-reported more comfort in non-technical skills of OVD, suggesting a step-wise effect of experience on first technical and then non-technical skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.