Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28271185›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2017

To transduce a zebra finch: interrogating behavioral mechanisms in a model system for speech.

Jonathan B Heston, Stephanie A White

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genomic loss of GPR108 disrupts AAV transduction in birds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Why zebra finches don't get hypercholesterolemia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan B HestonInterdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Stephanie A WhiteInterdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. sawhite@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-2294
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Formation and Function of Circuitry for Vocal LearningR01MH070712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WHITE, STEPHANIE ANN · 2005 to 2017
$3.1M
Training Program in Neural MicrocircuitsT32NS058280 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FELDMAN, JACK L · 2007 to 2017
$2.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR NEUROBIOLOGYT32MH019384 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GLANZMAN, DAVID L · 1995 to 2011
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070712NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019384NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS058280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to alter neuronal gene expression, either to affect levels of endogenous molecules or to express exogenous ones, is a powerful tool for linking brain and behavior. Scientists continue to finesse genetic manipulation in mice. Yet mice do not exhibit every behavior of interest. For example, Mus musculus do not readily imitate sounds, a trait known as vocal learning and a feature of speech. In contrast, thousands of bird species exhibit this ability. The circuits and underlying molecular mechanisms appear similar between disparate avian orders and are shared with humans. An advantage of studying vocal learning birds is that the neurons dedicated to this trait are nested within the surrounding brain regions, providing anatomical targets for relating brain and behavior. In songbirds, these nuclei are known as the song control system. Molecular function can be interrogated in non-traditional model organisms by exploiting the ability of viruses to insert genetic material into neurons to drive expression of experimenter-defined genes. To date, the use of viruses in the song control system is limited. Here, we review prior successes and test additional viruses for their capacity to transduce basal ganglia song control neurons. These findings provide a roadmap for troubleshooting the use of viruses in animal champions of fascinating behaviors-nowhere better featured than at the 12th International Congress!

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalTransduction, GeneticAnimalsFinchesForkhead Transcription FactorsFunctional LateralityGene Expression RegulationGlobus PallidusGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLentivirusNeuronsSynapsinsVocalization, AnimalZebrafish ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxP2 protein, zebrafishGreen Fluorescent ProteinsSynapsinsZebrafish ProteinsBirdsongMedium spiny neuronPallidumStriatumVirus

Identifiers

PMID28271185
PMCPMC5589492
OpenAlexW2591921397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.